Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/574/2015

S.Sampath Kumar , Rep. by its POA V.Ram Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Mahalakshmi Enterprises Rep. by its Partner Anuja R.Bajaj & 4 otheres - Opp.Party(s)

S.Vijayaraghavan

29 Mar 2023

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

              BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                 Thiru.R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                ::      MEMBER

 

CC. No. 574/2015

 

                                                           DATED THIS THE 29^th    DAY OF MARCH 2023

 

 

S.Sampath Kumar,

S/o R.Srinivasan,

Rep.by its Power Agent,

Mr.V.Ram Kumar,

No.24, Crystal Residency,

No.2, 3^rd Cross, Arundale Beach Road,

Chennai – 90                                                                                                    ..Complainant

 

                                                                          Vs

1. Mahalakshmi Enterprises,

Rep.by its Partner Anuja R.Bajaj,

4A, Stringers Road,

Chennai – 600 007         

 

2. Anuja R.Bajaj,

W/o Rajesh S.Bajaj,

Partner, Mahalakshmi Enterprises,

4A, Stringers Road,

Chennai – 600 007         

 

3. Smt.C.Savitiri Choonilal,

4A, Stringers Road,

Chennai – 600 007         

 

4. Smt.Sarala Santkumar,

4A, Stringers Road,

Chennai – 600 007         

 

5. Bajaj Properties Developers Private Ltd,

Rep.by its director Rajesh S.Bajaj,

No.71, Pantheon Road,

Egmore, Chennai – 600 008                                                               ..Opposite parties

 

Counsel for the complainant                   : M/s S.Vijayaraghavan

Counsel for the Ops 1,2 & 5                   : M/s  V. Arvind Rajagopal

Counsel for the Op4                              :  M/s M.Shreedhar Associates

 

     This  complaint  is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :  

 

                                                      Docket order

 

       Both present. Today when the matter is taken into consideration, it is represented by the complainant  that this matter has been settled between the parties. Hence the complainant may be permitted to withdraw the case as settled out of court. Endorsement made to that effect. In view of the endorsement made by the complainant, the complainant is dismissed as withdrawn.

          Sd/-                                                                                                          Sd/-

  R  VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R. SUBBIAH

               MEMBER                                                                                  PRESIDENT