Haryana

Karnal

259/2014

Harmit Singh S/o Dharambir - Complainant(s)

Versus

Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Virender Singh

21 Dec 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                             Complaint No.259 of 2014

                                                        Date of instt.: 15.09.2014                                                                                         Date of decision 21.12.2017

 

Harmit Singh son of Shri Dharambir, resident of village Gagsina, Tehsil Gharaunda, District Karnal.                                                                                  ……..Complainant.

Versus

1. Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited, Magma House 24, Park Street, Kokkata-700016, through its Managing Director/C.E.O.

2. Magma HDI General Insurance Company Limited, Karnal Branch SCO 13 Sector-3, Karnal through its Branch Manager.

                  ……… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer Protection Act

 

Before:                   Sh.Jagmal Singh……….President.

                   Ms. Veena Rani……Member

                   Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

 

Present:        Shri Virender Chaudhary Advocate for complainant.

                   Shri Rohit Gupta Advocate for OPs.

 

ORDER:                                              

                   Learned counsel for complainant made a statement for withdrawal of the complaint on the ground that the valuation of the of the complaint exceeds the limits of the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Forum and prayed for exemption of the time consumed before this Forum for filing  afresh before the appropriate Commission.

                In view of the statement of complainant the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in view of the law laid down Hon’ble Supreme Court in Laxmi Engineering Works Versus PSG Industries Institute (1995) 3 SCC 583 the complainant would be at liberty to get the benefit of provisions of section 14 of the Limitation Act, to exclude the period spent in prosecuting the present complaint before this Forum while computing the period of limitation prescribed for filing such complaint. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
Dated:21.12.2017

                                                                             President,

                                                                   District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Forum, Karnal.

 

                             (Veena Rani)     (Anil Sharma ) 

                                Member        Member