Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/74/2021

The Chief Executive Cum Claim Officer, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Magimai, (Since Deceased),And 7 Others - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Elveera Ravindran

06 Jun 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F. A. No.74/2021

 

(Against the Order dt.16.02.2015 made in C.C. No.68/2013  on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chengalpattu)

DATED THE 06^TH DAY OF JUNE 2022

 

The Chief Executive cum Claim Officer,

M/s. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co.,

2^nd Floor, Priya Prasad Buildings,

No.19 A, Officers’ Lane,

Vellore – 632 502.                                                            .. Appellant / 1^st Opposite party.

-Versus-

 

1. Magimai (Since deceased),

S/o. Ellan,

No.500, Kalliyamman Koil Street,

Moosivakkam Village,

Vaiyavoor Post,

Maduranthakam Taluk,

Kancheepuram District.                                            .. 1^st Respondent / 1^st Complainant.

 

2. M/s. Rajalakshmi Automobiles Pvt. Ltd.,

No.46/8, GST Road Junction,

Malrozapuram Road,

Singaperumal Koil and Post,

Chengalpattu Taluk.                                              .. 2^nd Respondent / 2^nd Opposite party.

 

3. Mrs. Arisakthi,

W/o. Magimai,

 

4. Mr. Kumaravel,

S/o. Magimai,

 

5. Mr. Sathyamoorthi,

S/o. Magimai,

6. Mr. Marimuthu,

S/o. Magimai,

 

7. Mrs. Anusuya,

W/o. Prakash,

 

8. Mr. Arumugam,

S/o. Magimai,

 

All are residing at:-

No.500, Kalliamman Koil Street,

Moosivakkam Village,

Vaisavoor Post,

Madhuranthakam Taluk,

Kancheepuram District.                                .. Respondents 3 to 8 / Complainants 2 to 7.

 

Counsel for Appellant / 1^st Opposite party            : M/s. S.S. Sajeev Kesan

1^st Respondent / 1^st Complainant                         : Deceased

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 06.06.2022 for appearance of the appellant, and arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for the appellant.  There was no representation for appellant for the past several hearings.

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the Appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

               

               Sd/-                                                                                     Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                         PRESIDENT