Haryana

Ambala

CC/105/2021

Saristi Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Madaan Electronics - Opp.Party(s)

Saristi Kumar

09 Sep 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                                      Complaint case no.         :    105 of 2021.

                                                          Date of Institution           :    24.02.2021.

                                                          Date of decision     :    09.09.2022.

 

Saristi Kumar son of Anant Ram, resident of House No.102, Jaggi Colony, Peer Wali Gali, Phase-2, Ambala City, District Ambala (Haryana)

 

          ……. Complainant.

                                                Versus

 

1   Madaan Electronics, Main Road, Prem Nagar, Ambala City, District Ambala        (through its Prop).

2.  Bajaj Finance Limited, Model Town, Prem Nagar, Near Bank of Barods, Ambala      City (through its Finance Manager).

3.  Registered & Head Office Bajaj Finance Limited, 4th Floor, Survey No.208/1-B, Viman Nagar, Pune-411035, India (Through its M.D.).

 

                                                                                  ….…. Opposite Parties.      

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member,

Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.         

                            

Present:       Complainant in person.

                   OP No.1 already ex parte.

                   Shri U.S.Chauhan, Advocate, counsel for the OPs No.2 and 3.

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order:-       Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

                   Today, learned counsel for the OPs No.2 and 3 has suffered a statement, which is recorded separately, to the effect that the matter has been compromised with the complainant and he has paid the settled amount of Rs.7,700/-, to the complainant.  Complainant has also suffered a statement that he has heard the statement given by the learned counsel for the OPs No.2 and 3 and agrees with the same and received the amount of Rs.7,700/-, from the counsel for the OPs No.2 and 3. Now, he does not want to pursue the present complaint and withdraws the same.

                   In view of the statement suffered by the complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties concerned, free of costs, as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room. 

Announced: 09.09.2022.

 

          (Vinod Kumar Sharma)                     (Ruby Sharma)               (Neena Sandhu)

              Member                                             Member                          President

                                                                                                          DCDRC, Ambala

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.