Taken up through video conferencing. R.A. No. 31 of 2021 Vide the Order dated 16.02.2021, the written version of the opposite party no. 4, which was filed beyond 45 days of receipt of notice, was not taken on record. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 4 / applicant draws attention to the principle contained in Hon’ble Supreme Court’s Order dated 08.03.2021 in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, and citing the COVID-19 situation, requests that the order may be reviewed and the written version, filed with short delay beyond 45 days, be taken on record. Learned counsel for the complainants, taking reference in the same Order of Hon’ble Supreme Court, has no objection. The Order dated 16.02.2021 is modified to the extent that the written version of the opposite party no. 4 is taken on record. The complainants are directed to file their rejoinder to the written version of the opposite party no. 4 within four weeks from today, with copies to the opposite parties. The Registrar to list again, after four weeks, with timely intimation to the parties and to their learned counsel. Further to the penultimate paragraph of the Order dated 16.02.2021, the application for interim relief will be taken up after the rejoinder to the written version of the opposite party no. 4 is also on the record. Accordingly, the application for interim relief will be taken up on the next date of hearing. | 
