Haryana

StateCommission

CC/633/2017

COL. HARBINDER PAL SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

M3M INDIA LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

R.S. RANDHAWA

10 Sep 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                 

                                                Consumer Complaint No. 633 of 2017

                                                Date of the Institution: 13.10.2017

                                                Date of Decision: 10.09.2019

 

Col. Harbinder Pal Singh Tiwana, resident of 1803, Tower No.16, Lotus Boulevard, Sector 100, Noida-201304 (U.P).

 

…..Complainant

 

VERSUS

 

1.      M3M India Limited, Paras Twin Towers, Tower B, 6^th Floor, Golf Course Road, Sector 54, Gurgaon, through its Managing Director.

 

2.      Sehgal Estate, Authorized Partners of M3M India Limited, Paras Twin Towers, address D133, Sector 57, Gurgaon, Haryana through its Managing Director/ Authorized Representative.

 

3.      Cogent Realtors Private Limited, 303, Sagar Apartments, Sector 56, Gurgaon, Haryana through its Managing Director.

          2^nd Address :- C/o Manglam Multiplex Private Limited, A-503, Ansal Chamber, 3, Bikaji Cama Place, New Delhi-110066.

….. Opposite Parties

 

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President.

                   Ms. Manjula, Member.

 

                                      

Present:-    Shri Inderdeep Singh, counsel for the complainant-applicant.

                   Shri Rohit Rana, proxy counsel for Shri Kunal Dawar, counsel for opposite parties No.1 and 2.

                   Presence of opposite party No.3 already dispensed with.

                   None for opposite party No.4.

                                      

 

                                                O R D E R

 

T.P.S. MANN, J. (ORAL)

 

The complainant has filed the instant complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 wherein he has sought issuance of directions to the opposite parties to refund the amount of Rs.21,16,762/- alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the respective dates of payment besides Rs.3,00,000/- on account of harassment, mental agony and loss of income and a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards litigation expenses.

2.      Upon notice, opposite parties No.1, 2 & 4 have put in appearance whereas service of opposite party No.3 was dispensed with.  However, till date, no written version has been filed by any of the opposite parties. 

3.      Now a miscellaneous application No.257 of 2019 has been preferred by the complainant wherein he has sought permission to withdraw the complaint as the parties have amicably settled the matter.

4.      Learned counsel for opposite parties No.1 and 2 confirms the factum of settlement having been arrived at between the parties and accordingly, he has no objection if the complainant is allowed to withdraw the complaint.

5.      In view of the above, the miscellaneous application is allowed and the complaint instituted by the complainant is hereby dismissed as having been withdrawn.

 

         

         

Announced 10.09.2019

(Manjula)   Member

(T.P.S. Mann) President

    U.K.