Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/170/2012

SPENCERS LIMITED., THE MANAGER - Complainant(s)

Versus

M.P. SURESH BABU - Opp.Party(s)

B. SUNDAR

30 Jun 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F. A. No.170/2012

 

(Against the Order dt.05.01.2012 made in C.C. No.436/2008 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (South))

DATED THE 30^TH DAY OF JUNE 2022

 

The Manager,

M/s. Spencers Limited,

4^th Floor, Phase 1, Spencer Plaza,

No.769, Anna Salai,

Chennai – 600 002.                                                             .. Appellant / Opposite party.

-Versus-

 

Mr. M.P. Suresh Babu,

No.51, 4^th Street,

Pandian Nagar,

Vettuvankeni,

Chennai.                                                                         .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Opposite party            : M/s. B. Sundar

Counsel for Respondent / Complainant           : M/s. G.A. Thiagarajan

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 30.06.2022 for appearance of the appellant and for taking steps to implead the LRs of the respondent (F) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for the appellant.  There was no representation for the appellant continuously for the past several hearings.

Though notice had been served to the appellant for his appearance, he has not chosen to appear before this Commission.  

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant and for taking steps to implead the LRs of the respondent as finally or for dismissal.

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 P.M. still, there was no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

               

               Sd/-                                                                                                            Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                         PRESIDENT