NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1043/2012

URMILA YADAV - Complainant(s)

Versus

M.P. HOUSING BOARD & 2 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VARMA

02 Apr 2012

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 1043 OF 2012
 
(Against the Order dated 17/01/2012 in Appeal No. 58/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)
1. URMILA YADAV
W/o Sh Darshan Singh Yadav, R/o Village Meerpur, Post jigni Tehsil
Morena
M.P
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M.P. HOUSING BOARD & 2 ORS.
Paryavas Bhawan,Jail Road
Bhopal
M.P
2. Estate Manager,
M.P Housing Board,
Morena
M.P
3. Assitant Engineer,
M.P Housing Board Colony
Morena
M.P
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 1044 OF 2012
 
(Against the Order dated 17/01/2012 in Appeal No. 57/2011 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)
1. MAN SINGH YADAV
S/o Fateh Singh Yadav, R/o Village Mahrajpura,Tehsil,Jora
Morena
M.P
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. M.P. HOUSING BOARD & 2 ORS.
Paryavas Bhawan, Jail Road
Bhopal
M.P
2. Estate Manager,
M.P Housing Board
Morena
M.P
3. Assitant Engineer,
M.P Housing Board Colony,
Morena
M.P
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MR. SANJEEV KUMAR VARMA
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 02 Apr 2012
ORDER

        In execution, the District Forum, by its interim order dated 9.1.2012, directed the respondent/opposite parties to be personally present on the date fixed otherwise warrants will be issued for summoning them.

        Against the order of the District Forum, respondents filed appeal before the State Commission.  State Commission issued Notice to the petitioners/complainants and stayed the operation of the impugned order in the meantime till the next date of hearing.

        Against the order of the State Commission, present revision petition has been filed.

        No ground for interference is made out.  State Commission has, in its wisdom, simply issued the Notice to the petitioners and stayed the operation of the order of the District Forum till the next date of hearing.  Petitioners should appear before the State Commission and, if need be, move an application for vacation of the stay order.  Dismissed.

 

 
......................J
ASHOK BHAN
PRESIDENT
......................
VINEETA RAI
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.