M.L. Chandrashekar and C. Prabhudev V/S C.R. Narayana Murthy - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

CPA/94/11

C.R. Narayana Murthy - Complainant(s)

Versus

M.L. Chandrashekar and C. Prabhudev - Opp.Party(s)

19 Jul 1995

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.
consumer case(CC) No. CPA/94/11

C.R. Narayana Murthy						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
M.L. Chandrashekar and C. Prabhudev						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Complaint is filed claiming compensation of Rs.140/- and costs of this proceedings. According to him, he purchased 2 packets of broken wheat for Rs.12/- per packet. In the market the price of a packet of broken wheat was only Rs.7.00 or Rs.7.50/-. The opposite party has committed unfair trade practice by collecting Rs.15/- more than the prevailing market price. The packet did not contain the particulars such as maximum retail price, date of packing, weight and nature of product. Therefore, he has claimed total compensation of Rs.140/- which includes excess charge of Rs.15/- incidental lcharge of Rs.25.00 and compensation of Rs.100/- towards hardship and mental agony caused to him.

Complaint is filed claiming compensation of Rs.140/- and costs of this proceedings.<br /> According to him, he purchased 2 packets of broken wheat for Rs.12/- per packet. In the market the price of a packet of broken wheat was only Rs.7.00 or Rs.7.50/-. The opposite party has committed unfair trade practice by collecting Rs.15/- more than the prevailing market price. The packet did not contain the particulars such as maximum retail price, date of packing, weight and nature of product. Therefore, he has claimed total compensation of Rs.140/- which includes excess charge of Rs.15/- incidental lcharge of Rs.25.00 and compensation of Rs.100/- towards hardship and mental agony caused to him.