Andhra Pradesh

Anantapur

EA/5/2005

D.Somi Reddy - Complainant(s)

Versus

M.Gangadharaiah - Opp.Party(s)

T.RamaKrishna

31 Dec 2014

ORDER

District Counsumer Forum
District Court Complax
Anantapur
 
Execution Application No. EA/5/2005
In
cc/103/1997
 
1. D.Somi Reddy
S/o Patha Reddy Cultivation Vannampally Village Hindupur
Anantapur
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M.Gangadharaiah
Proprietor Ravi Engineering Works Hindupur
Anantapur
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MS. Y.H.Prameela Reddy PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri S.Niranjan Babu Member
 HONORABLE S.Sri Latha Member
 
For the Appellant:T.RamaKrishna, Advocate
For the Respondent: N.Ravikumar Reddy, Advocate
ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, ANANTHAPURAMU.

PRESENT: - Kumari Y.H.Prameela Reddy, M.A., LL.B., President

Sri S.Niranjan Babu, B.A., B.L., Male Member

Smt. M.Sreelatha, B.A.,B.L., Lady Member

Wednesday, the 31st day of December, 2014

E.A.No.05/2005 in C.C.No.103/1997

Between:

 

D.Somi Reddy S/o Patha Reddy,

Vannampalli Village,

Parigi mandal,

Ananthapuramu District.                                                  …          Petitioner/DHr.

 

Vs.

 

 

           M.Gandharaiah S/o H.N. Eswaraiah,

           Proprietor of Ravi Engineering Works,

           Station Road, Hindupur,

           Ananthapuramu District.                                          …      J.Dr./Opposite Party

 

      This E.A.case coming on this day for final hearing before us in the presence of Sri T.Ramakrishna Advocate for the Petitioner/D.Hr and Sri  N.Ravi Kumar Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent/J.Dr and after perusing the material papers on record and after hearing the arguments of both sides, the Forum delivered the following:

 

DOCKET ORDER

 

31.12.2014:

           

            Respondent/J.Dr present.  Petitioner/D.Hr called absent, inspite of receipt of notice. Hence, inspite of giving sufficient opportunity to the D.Hr. the D.Hr is not showing any interest to comply the orders of Hon’ble National Commissioner, New Delhi in Revision Petition No.527 of 2005, dt.13.03.2009, even the counsel for petitioner/D.Hr. reported no instructions. On the other hand the respondent/ J.Dr. is appearing before the Forum and reported ready. In these circumstanced, the E.A. is dismissed for default of D.Hr. but no costs in the circumstances.

                        Sd/-                                     Sd/-                                       Sd/- 

               LADY MEMBER,                        PRESIDENT                             MALE MEMBER

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM, DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM,   DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM

             ANANTHAPURAMU                 ANANTHAPURAMU                    ANANTHAPURAMU

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Y.H.Prameela Reddy]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri S.Niranjan Babu]
Member
 
[HONORABLE S.Sri Latha]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.