Orissa

Jagatsinghapur

CC/7/2024

Amaresh Kumar Mohanty - Complainant(s)

Versus

M.D , HDFC Bank Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.M.C.Swain

12 Sep 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION JAGATSINGHPUR
JAGATSINGHPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/7/2024
( Date of Filing : 04 Jan 2024 )
 
1. Amaresh Kumar Mohanty
Bikram Samal, At- Madhuban, G G H C Qtr No 97, PO- Madhuban, PS- Paradeep, Dist- Jagatsinghpur
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M.D , HDFC Bank Ltd
Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel West, Mumbai- 400013
2. B.M., HDFC Bank Ltd
At- A/62/1, Unit-8, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar- 751012
3. B.M., HDFC Bank Ltd
At/P.O./P.S.- Kujang, Dist.- Jagatsinghpur- 754141
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr.M.C.Swain, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Miss. S. Pattanaik & Associates, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 12 Sep 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                          C.C. No.07/2024

 

Amaresh Kumar Mohanty,

S/o. Sisir Kumar Mohanty,

At- Deshpur,

P.O.- Gagulaipada,

Dist.- Kendrapara,

At Present- C/o. Bikram Samal,

At- Madhuban, G.G.H.C Qtr No.97,

P.O.- Madhuban,

P.S.- Paradeep,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur.…………. Complainant

 

                                 (Versus)

 

  1. M.D., HDFC Bank Ltd.,

Regd. Official Bank House,

Senapati Bapat Marg,

Lower Parel (West),

Mumbai- 400013.

  1. B.M., HDFC Bank Ltd.,

At- A/62/1, Unit-8, Nayapalli,

Bhubaneswar- 751012.

  1. B.M., HDFC Bank Ltd.,

At/P.O./P.S.- Kujang,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur- 754141.…..… Opposite parties

 

For Complainant………..Mr. M.C. Swain, Advocate

For Opposite Parties……….Miss. S. Pattanaik & Associates

 

 

Date of Hearing: 30.8.2024                      Date of Judgment: 12.9.2024

ORDER BY HON’BLE PRESIDENT- MRS. M. SWAIN:

                                                                                             JUDGMENT

            Complainant has filed the consumer complaint U/s.35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 seeking not to repossess AL 4825 Truck bearing Regd. No.OD-35-F-5900 and to supply loan agreement and other documents etc. and pay compensation of Rs.3,00,000/-.

            Complainant took loan of Rs.45,50,000/- on 29.7.2022 to repay in 59 monthly EMI @ Rs.97,670/- commencing from 05.10.2022 to 05.8.2027. Complainant failed to pay and violated the agreement for which on apprehension of repossession complainant has filed the consumer complaint seeking aforesaid relief. There is not a single scrap of paper from complainant asking opposite parties to supply the aforesaid documents for which we find no merit in the consumer complaint and any deficiency on the part of opposite parties. Besides that complainant is a defaulter of loan as per agreement. Relationship between complainant and opposite parties is that of Debtor and Creditor.

            However taking a linnet view we dispose of the consumer complaint directing the opposite parties to supply the loan agreement copy and any other document as required by complainant available with opposite parties. The complainant shall pay his regular EMI and in addition to that pay Rs.20,000/- (twenty thousand) in each month towards pending EMI. With the aforesaid observation and direction the consumer complaint is disposed of. No cost. 

            Pronounced in the open Commission on this 12th Sept.,2024.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.