Kerala

StateCommission

A/09/579

New India Insurance Co. Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

M.C.Thomas - Opp.Party(s)

S.G.Satheesh

06 Jan 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/09/579
(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/08/2009 in Case No. CC 19/06 of District Pathanamthitta)
1. New India Insurance Co. Ltd.Kerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. M.C.ThomasKerala ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :

PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

 

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
          VAZHUTHACAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
 APPEAL NO.579/09
JUDGMENT DATED 6.1.2010
PRESENT
 
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU -- PRESIDENT
SHRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                             -- MEMBER                                                                                                 
1. The New India Assurance Co.Ltd.
    Public Sector Branch, Palayam,
    Trivandrum.
2. The Branch Manager,                                  -- APPELLANTS
    New India Assurance Company Ltd.,
    Changayil Buildings
    Pathanamthitta.
    (By Adv.Sreevaraham G.Satheesh)
                    Vs.
M.C.Thomas
Mulavelil House, Pariyarathumala,           -- RESPONDENT
Thukalassery, Thiruvalla.
 
JUDGMENT
JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU,PRESIDENT
 
            The appellant is the opposite party/Insurance Company in CC.19/06 in the file of CDRF, Pathanamthitta. The appellant is under orders to pay a sum of Rs.1,35,000/- towards the medical expenses with interest at 8% from the date of complaint and Rs.5000/- as compensation and 2,000/- as costs.
          2. Complainant has claimed reimbursement of medical expenses for the treatment undergone during the period of coverage of Pravasi Suraksha Policy. He underwent surgery in the St. Gregorious Cardio Vascular Centre.    He claimed a sum of Rs.1,35,000/-. The opposite party repudiated the claim on the ground that the illness was pre-existing.
          3. The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of Ext.PW1, DW1 and Exts.A1 to A3.
          4. We find that the opposite party appellant has not adduced any positive evidence to establish the fact that the deceased was pre-existing. There is nothing on record to establish that the illness was pre-existing. 
5. The counsel for the appellant has pointed out that the Kudumha Arogy scheme is a part of the policy and covered only Rs.1 lakh per individual towards medical expenses. We find that the same is specified in Ext.A1 copy of the policy. The same was not   brought to the notice of the Forum.
          In the circumstances, the order of the forum is modified to the effect that the amount liable to paid is to Rs.1 lakh and interest at 8 %    from the date of complaint and also compensation of Rs.5000/- and cost of Rs.2000/-. The rest of the directions of the Forum is sustained. The appeal is allowed in part as above.
JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU          -- PRESIDENT
 
 
                             M.K.ABDULLA SONA                             -- MEMBER
PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 06 January 2010