Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/238/2017

Mohamed raffee - Complainant(s)

Versus

M.Ashok chand - Opp.Party(s)

Lakshmipathi-applt

10 Nov 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/238/2017
( Date of Filing : 07 Aug 2017 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. Mohamed raffee
chennai 50
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. M.Ashok chand
chennai 17
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 10 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

                     BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                             Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.238/2017

(Against the order in C.C. No.119/2015, dated:08.05.2017 on the file of

D.C.D.R.F., Chennai (North))

                                                             DATED THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER  2021

 

Mohammed Raffee,

Proprietor,

M/s. Great Madras Builders, MSM Towers,

No.3, Yadaval Street,

Padi, Chennai – 600 050

                                                                                .. Appellant / Opposite party.

 

-Versus-

M. Ashok Chand

S/o. Mothilal,

F.3. Block. A. 1 Floor,

G.M.B’s Beehive Apartment,

10, Rathnavel Pandian Street,

Golden George Nagar,

Mugappair,

Chennai – 600 017                                                      .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for the Appellant / Opposite party         : M/s. M. Lakshmipathi

Counsel for the Respondent / Complainant       : M/s. Arvind Kumar

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 10.11.2021 for hearing. Due to non – representation of the Appellant, this Commission made the following order:                                                                                                

 

Docket order

 

            No representation for Appellant.  Today this matter is posted for appearance of Appellant and filing written arguments of both and for arguments (list). When this matter was called at 11.00 a.m, there was no representation for  Appellant, since the matter was passed over and again called at 1.00 noon,  the appellant was again not present. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                    Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                              PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.