Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/123/2023

The Chief Manager, State Bank of India & 2 Others - Complainant(s)

Versus

M. Lakshmi, W/o P.R.Mayilsamy & Anr. - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. K. KUMARAN

22 Feb 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.123/2023

 

(Against the Order dt.15.06.2022 made in C.C. No.346/2011 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Coimbatore)

DATED THE 22^ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

 

1. The Chief Manager,

State Bank of India,

SRKV Branch,

Periyanaickenpalayam,

Coimbatore – 20.

 

2. The Deputy General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Zonal Office,

State Bank Road,

Coimbatore – 641 018.

 

3. The General Manager,

State Bank of India,

Customer Grievance Redressal Cell,

Local Head Office,

No.16, College Lane,

Nungambakkam,

Chennai – 600 006.                                                     .. Appellants / Opposite parties.

 

-Versus-

1. M. Lakshmi.

W/o. P.R. Mayilsamy,

 

2. P.R. Mayilsamy,

S/o. Rangasamy,

No.10/3 D, Gandhi Nagar,

Puthur Road,

Thondamuthur Post,

Coimbatore – 641 109.                                              .. Respondents / Complainants.

 

Counsel for Appellants / Opposite parties              : M/s. K. Kumaran

              This appeal has been filed by the Appellants / Opposite parties to set aside the order dt.15.06.2022 made in C.C. No.346/2011 passed by the DCDRC, Coimbatore and has come up before us on 22.02.2023 and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                              

 

Docket Order

 

Appellants/ Opposite parties present.   

When the matter is taken up for consideration, the Counsel for the appellants / opposite parties has filed a Memo and stated that subsequent to the filing of this appeal in this Commission, they have complied with the Order dt. 15.06.2022 made in C.C. No.346/2011 of the D.C.D.R.C., Coimbatore.   Hence, they are not pressing the present appeal. Memo recorded. 

In view of the Memo, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.   No order as to cost.

The appellants / opposite parties are entitled to the Mandatory deposit.   Hence, the Registry is directed to discharge the mandatory deposit along with accrued interest in favour of the appellants / opposite parties.

 

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT