Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/10/16

Rajeev Nagar Resident's Association - Complainant(s)

Versus

M D Kerala Water Authority - Opp.Party(s)

31 Jan 2013

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/16
 
1. Rajeev Nagar Resident's Association
No.498/94, melaranoor, karamanap.o., Tvpm, Represented by its secretary A. N Sajeed, flat no. 42/504, melaranoor, karamana p.o., Tvpm
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. M D Kerala Water Authority
Tvpm
Kerala
2. Executive Engineer
P W D Building division, P M G Tvpm,
Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala
3. Executive engineer
KWA, Tvpm
Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala
4. Assistant Engineer
PWD, Building Division, Fort section, Tvpm
Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri G. Sivaprasad PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Beena Kumari. A Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT:

SHRI. G. SIVAPRASAD : PRESIDENT

SMT. BEENA KUMARI. A : MEMBER

SMT. S.K. SREELA : MEMBER

 

C.C.No. 16/2010 Filed on 20/01/2010

Dated : 31..01..2013

Complainant:

Rajeev Nagar Resident's Association No. 498/94, Melarannur, Karamana – P.O., Thiruvananthapuram. Represented by its Secretary A.N. Sajeed, Flat No. 42/504, Melarannur, Karamana – P.O., Thiruvnanthapuram.


 

(Party in person)

 

Opposite parties:

          1. M.D. Water Authority of Kerala, Vellayambalam, Thiruvananthapuram.

             

(Opp. Parties 1 & 3 by Adv. R. Rajesh)


 

          1. Executive Engineer, PWD Buildings Division, PMG, Thiruvananthapuram.

             

(Opp. Parties 2 & 4 by Adv. Paraniyam Devakumar)


 

          1. Executive Engineer, Water Authority, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram.

             

          2. A.E., PWD., Thiruvananthapuram Building Division, Fort Section, Statue, Thiruvananthapuram.

This O.P having been heard on 16..01..2013, the Forum on 31..01..2013 delivered the following:


 


 

ORDER

SMT. S.K.SREELA, MEMBER:


 

Both parties represented and complainant filed memo stating that, in the meeting of the office bearers of the complainant's Association and the opposite parties held on 11/10/2012, it was decided to remit 50% of the arrears and that separate water meter shall be installed by the opposite parties and subsequently water charges shall be revised taking 4 months average of the reading shown in the meter. Opposite party produced the minutes of the meeting. Both parties submitted that order be passed accordingly. Hence it is hereby ordered as per the minutes that each consumer of the complainant's association shall remit the 50% of the arrears before 15/3/2013, PWD shall install separate meters for every quarters and shall install meter for the main sump also. The water charges from 9/08 shall be revised on the basis of the new reading (taking 4 months average) and the same shall be applicable only to those consumers who have remitted 50% of the arrears.

 

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.


 


 


 

 

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the open Forum, this the 31st day of January, 2013.

sd/-

S.K. SREELA, MEMBER. sd/-

G. SIVAPRASAD,

PRESIDENT.

sd/-

BEENA KUMARI.A, MEMBER.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri G. Sivaprasad]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Beena Kumari. A]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.