Present counsel for the petitioner and respondent in person present.

          We have seen the compromise order passed by the State Commission.  The State Commission mentions Clause 3 of Para No.3 of the compromise submitted before DRT.  We have perused the compromise deed appearing at page No.93 of this revision petition.  There is no clause 3 appended with para No.3.  It appears to be a mistake. 

          Both the parties heard.  The order dated 31.05.2013 is hereby set aside and case is remanded before the State Commission for hearing and rectifying the same. 

          Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original complaint is barred by time.  That question also to be kept open. 

          Parties are directed to appear before the state Commission on 10.10.2013.

          Respondent states that he will not execute the order till the decision of the State Commission.