Ganesh Kumar filed a consumer case on 02 Dec 2022 against Ludhiana Mediways Pvt.Ltd in the Rupnagar Consumer Court. The case no is RBT/CC/18/169 and the judgment uploaded on 08 Dec 2022.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CAMP COURT AT LUDHIANA
RBT/Consumer Complaint No. 169 of 12.3.2018
Date of Decision: 02.12.2022
Ganesh Kumar, aged 52 years, son of Late Sh. Bal Krishan, presently resident of New Abadi Phillaur, District Jalandhar through his attorney Sh. Rakesh Kumar Goyal, son of late Sh. Bal Krishan, presently resident of new Abadi Phillaur, District Jalandhar
……Complainant
Versus
….Opposite Parties
Complaint under Consumer Protection Act
QUORUM:-
SH. RANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT
SMT. RANVIR KAUR, MEMBER
ARGUED BY:-
Sh. G.S. Bal, Adv. For complainant
Ops exparte.
ORDER:-
SH. RANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT
The present order of ours will dispose of the above complaint received by way of transfer from District Consumer Commission, Ludhiana, filed under Consumer Protection Act, by the complainant against the opposite parties on the ground that the complainant is being filed by the complainant through his attorney Sh. Rakesh Kumar Goyal son of Late Sh. Bal Krishan presently resident of New Abadi Phillaur, District Jalandhar. Sh. Rakesh Kumar Goyal, has complete knowledge about the facts of the case and he is competent to depose about the same in this Hon’ble Commission. The complainant suffered fits attack on 29.9.2017 and he fell down in his house. He was immediately removed by his brother from his place of residence to opposite party for treatment. OP No.2 & 3 gave treatment to the complainant for cardio respiratory arrest in the hospital of opposite parties. The complainant remained admitted under OPS No.2 &6 3 in the hospital of OP1 within effect from 29.9.2017 to 2.10.2017 for his treatment. During the said period the Ops No.2 & 3 conducted different tests and wrongly diagnosed the complainant for the disease which he was not suffering from. Thereafter, the OP1 at the instance of Ops No.2 & 3 raised illegal bill for Rs.1,04,270/- from the complainant. The complainant was not satisfied with the diagnose and treatment provided by the Ops and to this effect the complainant raised protest but it is Ops, who were not ready to listen genuine grievances of the complainant. Under the compelling circumstances of the complainant shown his intention for discharging him from the OP No.1 made the payment to OP1 at the instance of Ops No.2 & 3. The complainant was not satisfied with the treatment provided by the Opposite Parties and being dissatisfied got hism discharged from opposite parties under LAMA. The complainant was got admitted for his treatment on 2.10.2017 in unit Hero DMC Heart institute New Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Civil Lines, Ludhiana and the complainant was attended upon By Dr.Bishav Mohan and Dr. Bhupinder Singh and they done different tests and invstigation and discharged the complainant on 4.10.2017 and the complainant was found to be normal by the said hospital. The complainant was not suffering from any disease diagnosed and treatment meted out by Ops. The complainant was kept in a dark by opposite parties and opposite parties have malafide and illegally charged Rs.1,07,270/- from the complainant by putting him in a fear of a disease which he was not suffering from. Thus, alleging deficiency in service on the part of the OPs, the complainant sought the following reliefs against the OPs:-
Announced:
02.12.2022 (RANJIT SINGH)
PRESIDENT
(RANVIR KAUR)
MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.