Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/372/09

M/S NARNE ESTATES PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD - Complainant(s)

Versus

LT.COL.D.SIVARAMA PRASAD - Opp.Party(s)

M/S D.VENKAT REDDY

01 Jul 2010

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/372/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Visakhapatnam-II)
 
1. M/S NARNE ESTATES PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MD
OFFICE AT NO.1, GUNROCK ENCLAVE, KARKHANA, SEC-BAD-500 009.
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER
 
 

 BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A.No. 372 HYDERABAD

 

Between

1.  M/s Narne Estates (P) Ltd.,
rep. by its Managing Director
Office at No.1, Gunrock Enclave
Karkhana, Secunderabad-009

2.  The General Manager,
Narne Estates Pvt., Ltd.
Gunrock Enclave, Karkhana
Secunderabad-009

                                                               

                                                               

       

 

Lt. Col.D.Sivarama Prasad
S/o late Sri D.Ankamma, Aged 47 yrs
R/o H.No.A-17, Vedvihar, AWHO
Tirmulgherry, Secunderabad

                                                               Counsel for the Appellants                    

Counsel for the Respondents                

 

 QUORUM:SRI SYED ABDULLAH, HON’BLE MEMBER

                                                                                

 

                                              

                                           

 

Oral Order ( As per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member)
     

       The opposite parties no.1 and 2 in C.C.No.404 of 2008 on the file of District Forum-III,Hyderabad 

             The opposite parties collected an amount of Rs.25,000/- towards developmental charges, Rs.6,000/- towards registration charges and Rs.5,000/- towards club fees from the complainant by issuing a nil balance due receipt on 23.1.2002.        

              

       

        

       

        

         The complainant never approached the appellants/opposite parties to clear the outstanding dues and get the plot registered and that the relief sought by the respondent/complainant is that of a civil nature and to enforce a contractual obligation of registering sale deed pertaining to immovable property a suit has to be instituted before the appropriate civil court for specific performance of contract. 

        

         

               

            

        Ex.B4 shows that the complainant has paid Rs.15,000/- towards the cost of the plot, Rs.62,500/- towards developmental charges, Rs.25,000/- towards registration charges.   

        Ex.A12 as well as Ex.A10 clearly indicates the payment of entire developmental charges by the complainant by the respective dates of issue of the documents. Ex.A10 was issued on 30.3.2000 whereas Ex.A12 was issued on 23.1.2000, admittedly both the documents were issued subsequent to the date of issue of Ex.B3.     

         

 

 

                                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     KMK*

              

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.