Parvinder Kumar filed a consumer case on 28 Nov 2008 against Lovely Professional University in the Kapurthala Consumer Court. The case no is CC/08/29 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
Punjab
Kapurthala
CC/08/29
Parvinder Kumar - Complainant(s)
Versus
Lovely Professional University - Opp.Party(s)
In person
28 Nov 2008
ORDER
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KAPURTHALA Building No. b-XVII-23, 1st Floor, fatch Bazar, Opp. Old Hospital, Amritsar Road, Kapurthala consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/29
Parvinder Kumar
...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Lovely Professional University
...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE:
1. Gulshan Prashar 2. Paramjeet singh Rai
Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):
1. Parvinder Kumar
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. Lovely Professional University
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
1. In person
OppositeParty/Respondent(s):
ORDER
The complainant has filed the present complaint against Vice Chancellor Lovely Professional University,, Jalandhar and others claiming that respondent is a University enacted by the Government of Punjab under the enactment of State Legislature namely the Lovely Professional University. It is alleged by the complainant that in response to the said invitation, the complainant applied for admission in the University of opposite party and was offered a seat.. It is alleged that on the asking of the officials of the respondent, he deposited a total sum of Rs.39,500/- as admission fee . It is alleged by the complainant decided to give up the course as the building was under construction and surrendered his seat and as such applied for the refund of the admission charges deposited by him with the respondents as detailed above. But the respondents did not make the refund of admission charges despite repeated requests. The complainant's father also sent a reminder for the refund of the above amount which the opposite parties failed to pay the complainant which is a deficiency in service on the part of opposite party. Hence the present complaint 2. Notice of the complaint was given to the opposite party who appeared before the Forum and contested the complaint of the complainant. 3. The parties led evidence upto their satisfaction and after the close of evidence by the parties, when the case was fixed for arguments on 28.11.2008, the counsel for the complainant made statement to the effect that a compromise has been effected with the opposite party and as per the said compromise, out of the total amount of fee Rs.39,500/- deposited by the complainant with the opposite party 75% of the above said amount which comes to Rs.29625/- shall be paid back by the opposite party to the complainant. In view of the above, the counsel for the opposite party made statement admitting the statement of counsel for the complainant and submitted that the complaint be decided according to the statement of counsel for the complainant. In view of the statements of counsel for the parties recorded on 28.11.2008, the complaint of the complainant is hereby allowed and opposite party Vice Chancellor Lovely Professional University, near Cheheru Bridge, Jalandhar Phagwara road, Jalandhar is directed to refund 75% of Rs.39500/- already deposited by the complainant with the opposite party within one month from the receipt of this order. Parties are left to bear their own costs. Let certified copy of the judgment be sent to the parties through registered post free of costs without any delay. File be consigned to the record room. Dated: Gulshan Prashar Paramjit Singh 28.11.2008 Member President
......................Gulshan Prashar ......................Paramjeet singh Rai
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.