Kerala

Palakkad

75/2004

Jeema Rajan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Lloyds Finance Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

T S Sunil

12 Nov 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. 75/2004
( Date of Filing : 24 May 2004 )
 
1. Jeema Rajan
W/o. Rajan Paul, 18/576, Thottingal, Palakkad -14
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Lloyds Finance Ltd
Registered Office, 601 Raheeja Centre, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021.
2. Lloyds Finance Ltd
2nd Floor, Sanidhya Complex, Opp. Sanyas Ashram, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad-380 009
Ahamedabad
Delhi
3. Lloyds Finance Ltd.
Regional Office,53, T V Swamy Road (W), R S Puram, Coimbatore-641 002
Coimbatore
Tamilnadu
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 12 Nov 2021
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PALAKKAD

Dated this the 12th  day of November,  2021

Present      :   Sri.Vinay Menon.V  President

                  :   Smt.Vidya.A, Member                                      Date of filing  : 24/05/2004         

             OP/75/2004   

Jeema Rajan

W/o.Rajan Pillai Paul

18/576, Thottingal
Palakkad – 14                                                                       -           Complainant

                                                                                                  Vs

  1. Lloyds Finance Ltd.

      Regd.Office, 601, Raheeja Centre

      Nariman Point, Mumbai – 21

  1. Lloyds Finance Ltd.

       2nd Floor, Sanidhya Complex,

       Opp.Sanyas Ashram, Ashram Road,

       Ahamedabad – 380 009

  1. Lloyds Finance Ltd.

      Regional Office, 53, TV Swamy Road (W)

      RS Puram, Coimbatore – 641 002                                          -           Opposite parties

O R D E R 

 

By Smt.Vidya.A., Member

 

  1.  This OP had been lying  dormant from 11/08/2004   onwards.    Hence notice was issued to the parties to appear before this Commission on 12/11/2021.  When the matter was called  the counsel for the petitioner entered appearance. There was no representation for opposite parties.   
  2. From a perusal of the records it has transpired that this claim  was one of the subject matter in   Company Application No.223/2004, in C.P.1017/2002 before    Honourable High Court of Mumbai  wherein a liquidator was appointed to consider the claim of the creditors of the company under winding up procedures.
  3.  Hence the  complaint is dismissed.

Pronounced in open court on this the 12th day of  November, 2021.

Sd/-

                                                                                                      Vinay Menon V

                                                 President

 Sd/-

Vidya.A

                    Member      

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Vinay Menon.V]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Vidya A]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.