Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/42/2011

Vertigo Outdoor Services Rep By Its Proprietor - Complainant(s)

Versus

LIPI Marketing Private Limited,Rep By Its Director - Opp.Party(s)

P.Bhaskaran

11 Aug 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/42/2011
( Date of Filing : 15 Jul 2011 )
 
1. Vertigo Outdoor Services Rep By Its Proprietor
Triplicane, Chennai-5.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. LIPI Marketing Private Limited,Rep By Its Director
Kottivakkam, Chennai
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 11 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                         BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                            Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                             ::      MEMBER

 

CC. No. 42/2011

                                                                  DATED THE 11TH  DAY OF AUGUST 2021

 

 M/s. Vertigo Outdoor Services,

Represented by its Proprietor,

Mr.John Sebastian,

At No.273, Pycrofts Road,

Triplicane, Chennai 600 005                                     ..Complainant

                                             Vs

M/s LIPI MARKETING Pvt. Ltd,

Represented by its Director,

Mr.Matthew,

No.32, Nehru Nagar 1st Link street,

Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR),

Kottivakkam, Chennai – 600 041                             ..opposite party

 

Counsel for the complainant           : M/s P.S.Bhaskar, Advocate

Counsel for the opposite party        : M/s V.Balaji

          This complaint coming on before us for hearing today, this Commission made the following order in open court :

                                                                                       Docket order

          No representation for complainant. Opposite party present. When the matter came up at 10.30 A.M, the complainant was not present. Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 11.45 A.M, but the complainant was again not present. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

          Sd/-                                                                                                                 Sd/-

S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                                                         R. SUBBIAH             

          MEMBER                                                                                                PRESIDENT

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.