Haryana

Panchkula

CC/225/2019

MAMTA. - Complainant(s)

Versus

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORTAION & OTHERS. - Opp.Party(s)

SIKANDER BAKSHI

18 Jun 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.                               

Consumer Complaint No.	:	225 of 2019
Date of Institution	:	09.04.2021
Date of Decision	:	18.06.2021

 

 

 

 

 

Smt. Mamta wife of Late Shri Mahinder Pal, resident of House No.1939, Amb Sahib Colony, Sector 64A, Village Jagatpur, Tehsil and District SAS Nagar (Mohali), Punjab.

                                                                                               ­….Complainant

Versus

1.       Life Insurance Corporation of India, through its Branch Manager, Branch Office-16N, Bay No.71-72, Sector-2, Panchkula.

2.       Life Insurance Corporation, Divisional Office, P.O. No.106, “Jeevan Parkash”, 43, Model Town, Karnal-132001, through its Divisional Manager.

3.       Life Insurance Corporation, Jeevan Bharati, Tower-11, 124, Conataught Circus, PB No.630, New Delhi-110001, through its Zonal Manager.

4.       Lala Ram authorized representative of LIC (Agent) R/o 131, Indira Colony, Sector-17, Panchkula.

          2^nd Address:

          Sh. Lala Ram authorized representative of LIC of India, Branch Office-16N, Bay No.71-72, Sector-2, Panchkula.

                                                                                     ….Opposite Parties

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 AS AMENDED UPTO DATE.

 

Before:         Mr. Satpal, President.     

                     Dr. Pawan Kumar Saini, Member.

                     Dr. Sushma Garg, Member.

 

Present:-      Sh. Sikander Bakshi, Advocate, counsel for the Complainant.

                     Ms. Kanchan Bala, Advocate, counsel for OPs No.1 to 3.

                     OP No.4 already ex parte vide order dated 22.05.2019.

                     Today, the case is fixed for filing power of attorney as well as evidence by the OPs No.1 to 3. Fresh memo of appearance filed by Ms. Kanchan Bala, Advocate for OPs No. l to 3. At this stage, Shri Sikander Bakshi, Advocate, counsel for the complainant, by making a separate statement, stated on the instructions of the Complainant, that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint as the dispute has been amicably settled with the OPs as complainant has received full and final amount in regard to the present complaint from the OPs, and, now, nothing is due against the OPs, therefore, he wants to withdraw the same, being fully satisfied on behalf of the Complainant.

                     Heard. In view of the statement made by Ld. Counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, being fully satisfied.

                     A copy of this order be sent to the parties concerned, free of costs and File be consigned to record room after due compliance.

Dt.                  (Dr.Sushma Garg)             (Dr. Pawan Kumar Saini)          (Satpal)

18.06.2021           Member                            Member                             President