Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/374/2010

Smt. Nirmal Kaur - Complainant(s)

Versus

Life Insurance Corporation - Opp.Party(s)

22 Dec 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 374 of 2010
1. Smt. Nirmal KaurWd/Late Sh. Gurbinder Singh son of Jagtar Singh R/o House No. 345 Village Raipur Khurd UT Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Life Insurance Corporation Jeevan Jyoti Building 99-A Guru nanak Colony Rajpura Township Distt. Patiala2. life Insurance Corporation Divisional Office Jeevan Parkash Bldg. sector-17/B ChandigarhUT ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 22 Dec 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

 

Complaint Case No. 374 of 2010

 

 

Smt.Nirmal Kaur, Wd/O Late Sh.Gurbinder Singh, son of Jagtar Singh, R/o H.No.345, Village Raipur Khurd, UT Chandigarh.      

                                                                             

                                                                              –          Complainant

 

                                                            Versus

 

1.         Life Insurance Corporation Jeevan Jyoti Building, 99-A, Guru Nank Colony, Rajpura Township, Distt. Patiala.

2.         Life Insurance Corporation Divisonal Office, Jeevan Parkash Building, Sector 17-B, Chandigarh.

                                                                                    –          Opposite Parties

 

Present:          Sh.B.S.Multani, Advocate for Complainant.

                        Sh.Rajesh K.Sharma, Advocate for OPs.

 

                                                                                   

                                                            ORDER

 

                        In view of the statement made by Sh.B.S.Multani, Advocate for complainant, the complaint is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the complainant to file fresh before the appropriate Forum having territorial jurisdiction, as permitted by law.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

 

22.12.2010                 (MADHU MUTNEJA)                                         (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)      

                                                                MEMBER                                                     PRESIDING   MEMBER             



MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,