Haryana

Panipat

CC/158/2023

Smt. Lichmi alias Laxmi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Life Insurance Corporation of India - Opp.Party(s)

Shri Ram Dass Tyagi

05 Aug 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/158/2023
( Date of Filing : 09 May 2023 )
 
1. Smt. Lichmi alias Laxmi
Wife of Late Sh. Anoop Singh Resident of Village Sanoli Kalan, Tehsil Bapoli District Panipat (aged 64 years) Aadhar No. 376531529330.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Branch situated at Rajguru Market, Near Bus Stand, Panipat through its The Branch Manager/ Authorized person.
2. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Divisional Office P.O. Box No.106, Jeevan Prakash, 489, Model Town, Karnal-132001 through its The Divisional Officer/ Authorized person.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. R. K. Dogra PRESIDENT
  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Shri Ram Dass Tyagi, Advocate for the complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Ms. Ekta Bamel, Advocate for opposite parties.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 05 Aug 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                    No evidence of complainant is present. A date is requested on behalf of the complainant, which is opposed. Heard. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 06.12.2023 and today is last opportunity on payment of costs Rs.500/-. Even cost has not been paid by the complainant and no efforts has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainant has already availed four effective opportunities including two last opportunities. Hence, there are no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by order of this Commission.

 2.               This complaint has been filed against the respondents seeking claim of Rs.6,00,000/- alongwith compensation to the tune of Rs.50,000/- alongwith Rs.22,000/- as litigation expenses  as the claim of the complainant has not been given by the respondents. In written statement, all the allegations have been denied by the opposite parties and dismissal of the complaint was prayed for.

3.                As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.                This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room.

 
 
[ Dr. R. K. Dogra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Rekha Chaudhary]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.