Telangana

Karimnagar

CC/36/2015

Peddula Laxmi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Life Insurance Corporation of India - Opp.Party(s)

V.S.S. Babu

31 Mar 2015

ORDER

PRESENT HONOURABLE SMT. K. SUJANA, Chairman LRAT-cum-IIIrd Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge and President (FAC)
SRI G.SREENIVAS RAO, M.Sc.,B.Ed., LL.B., PGADR (NALSAR), MEMBER
 
Complaint Case No. CC/36/2015
 
1. Peddula Laxmi
w/o Late Venkati,Age 55 yrs,Occ Housewife,R/O Suryanagar,Godavarikhani,Mdl Ramagundam,Dis Karimnagar.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Ramagundam Branch.R/by it's Manager Beside of Rajeev Rahadari,Post Godavarikhani,Dis Karimnagar.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SMT. K. SUJANA, Chairman LRAT CUM IIIrd Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. G.SREENIVAS RAO, M.Sc.,B.Ed., LL.B., PGADR, NALSAR MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:V.S.S. Babu, Advocate
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM ::AT:: KARIMNAGAR, TELANGANA STATE

PRESENT: SMT. K. SUJANA, Chairman LRAT-cum-IIIrd Addl. Dist. & Sessions Judge & President (FAC)

AND

SRI G.SREENIVASRAO, M.Sc.,B.Ed.,LL.B., PGADR (NALSAR), MEMBER

TUESDAY THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND FIFTEEN

CONSUMER COMPLAIANT NO. 36 OF 2015

 

Between:

Peddula Laxmi, W/o. Late Venkati, Age 55 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Suryanagar, Godavarikhani, Ramagundam mandal of Karimnagar dist.

                                                                                                                                                                    …  Complainant

AND

Life Insurance Corporation of India, Ramagundam branch, R/by it’s Manager, Beside of Rajeev Rahadari, Post Godavarikhani, District Karimnagar – 505 209.

                                                                                                                                                                  …Opposite Party

This complaint is coming up before us for hearing on 31-3-2015 in the presence of Sri V.Shivashankar Babu and T. Rajkumar, Advocates for complainant and Sri P.Ashok, Advocate for opposite party, and on perusing the material papers on record and having stood over for consideration this day, the Forum passed the following.

O R D E R

I.A.90/2015 is allowed. C.C. is advanced today. Complainant filed memo not pressing the C.C. as the matter is settled outside the Forum. Counsel for complainant represented the same. Hence C.C. is dismissed as not pressed.

Written and corrected by me, after correction the orders pronounced by us in the open court this the 31st day of March, 2015.

 

                                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-

                           MEMBER                                                                               PRESIDENT (FAC)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SMT. K. SUJANA, Chairman LRAT CUM IIIrd Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. G.SREENIVAS RAO, M.Sc.,B.Ed., LL.B., PGADR, NALSAR]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.