Assam

StateCommission

MA/62/2016

Najib Uddin Ahmed - Complainant(s)

Versus

Life Insurance Corporation of India - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. R. Sarkar

20 Apr 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/62/2016
In
First Appeal No. A/46/2016
 
1. Najib Uddin Ahmed
S/o Late Md. Gows,R/o F. A. Road, Kumarpara,Guwahati-781001, Dist.-Kamrup, Assam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Housing Finance Ltd.,2nd Floor, Bombay Living Building, 45/47 Veer Naiman Road, Fort Mumbai
2. Director & Chief Executive, LICI, HFL
2nd Floor, Bombay Living Building, 45/47 Veer Naiman Road, Fort Mumbai
Maharastra
3. The Manager of LICI Housing Finance Limited
Jeevan Prakash Ground Floor, S. S. Road, Fancy Bazar, Guwahati-781001
Kamrup
Assam
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. A. Dasgupta,Advocate, Proxy for Mr. R. Sarkar, Advocate for
For the Respondent:
Dated : 20 Apr 2017
Final Order / Judgement

 

               Heard Mr. A. Dasgupta, learned Sr. counsel, assisted by Mr. R. Sarkar, appearing for the applicant. Mr. Dasgupta has submitted that they have taken steps upon respondent No. 3 by dasti service and the same was declared to be complete vide order dated 6-2-2017 passed by this Commission.

               Further, pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 6-2-2017, Mr. Dasgupta has submitted certificates issued by the postal department showing service of notice upon respondent Nos. 1 and 2. However, none appeared for respondents despite service of notice.

               In view of the above position, the following order is passed after hearing Mr. Dasgupta, learned counsel, appearing for the applicant.

              This is an application for condoning the delay of 8 days in preferring the accompanying appeal. We have perused the statements made in the application. The grounds for delay has been explained at paragraph 4 of the application. We have found that sufficient causes have been shown for not preferring the appeal in time. Thus, considering the statements made in the application, particularly, statements made on oath at paragraph 4 of the application, also for the ends of justice, delay in preferring the accompanying appeal is condoned.

              Misc Case is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.