This is the third occasion that a request for adjournment has been received by post from the Petitioner. We do not approve rather deprecate such a practice of the petitioner seeking repeated adjournments by writing letters to this Commission. We are unable to show any further indulgence in the matter and the prayer is declined. The revision petition has been considered. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances and that the complainant admitted before the State Commission that the builder has already provided separate electricity connections/meters in the name of the ..2.. respective complainants, we are of the opinion that the impugned order passed by the State Commission is just and does not suffer from any material irregularity, illegality or jurisdictional error which calls for interference by this Commission in exercise of its revisional jurisdiction u/s 21(b) the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The revision petition is dismissed accordingly.