Haryana

Karnal

334/2012

Sat Narain Goel S/o Het Ram - Complainant(s)

Versus

LIC Of India - Opp.Party(s)

Vineet Kumar

27 Oct 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 334/2012
 
1. Sat Narain Goel S/o Het Ram
Shop No.23, New grain Markit, Gharaunda , Distt. Karnal
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No.  334  of 2012

                                                               Date of instt.10.07.2012                                                                    

                                                Date of decision: 10.03.2015

 

Sat Narain Goel son of Shri Het Ram c/o M/s Sat Narain Parveen Kumar, Shop No.23,  New Grain Market, Gharaunda, tehsil Gharaunda District Karnal.

                                                     ………..Complainant.

                             Versus

 

LIC of India through its Branch Manager, Branch Karnal-I,  tehsil and  District Karnal.

                                                ……… Opposite Party.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.Subhash Goyal……. President.

                   Smt.Shashi Sharma….Member.

                  

 

 Present        Sh.Complainant with Sh.Vinod Kumar Advocate.

                   Sh.Satpal Singh Advocate for the OP.

ORDER:

         

                    Sh.Satpal Singh Advocate for the OP has made a statement that the OP is ready to make the payment as  per terms and conditions of the policy and letter dated 4.3.2015 and has  sought seven days time for the same. The complainant has also  made a statement  to the effect that keeping in view statement made by the learned counsel for the OP, he withdraw the present complaint and he be issued sanction letter regarding deduction of TDS. Statements of both the parties have been recorded separately. Therefore, in view of the statements made by the parties, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance. 

 

Announced
dated: 10.03.2015                                                                           

                                                              (Subhash Goyal)

                                                             President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

                   (Smt.Shashi Sharma)

                             Member.

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shashi Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.