Perused the letter of the petitioner received on 9^th March 2010.

              The District Forum had allowed the complaint filed by the petitioner with directions to the respondent/ opposite party insurance company to pay amount of Rs.60,000/- along with 12% interest with effect from 28^th February 2006. This included the amount of Rs.30,000/- towards accidental benefit under the policy. In appeal filed by the Insurance Company, the State Commission vide order dated 28.05.2009 has modified the forum’s order holding that the petitioner is not entitled to the amount of Rs.30,000/- of accidental benefits. State Commission having considered the history as recorded in Bed Head Ticket of the hospital where the life assured was admitted, has reached the conclusion that the life assured had fallen due to seizure and the death arising there from could not be treated as an accidental death. We are not inclined to take a view different from that taken by the State Commission in the matter. There is no illegality or jurisdictional error in the order of State Commission warranting interference in revisional jurisdiction under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. Revision is, therefore, dismissed.