NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4036/2009

JYOSTHNARANI SAMAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

LIC OF INDIA - Opp.Party(s)

IN PEROSN

26 Mar 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 4036 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 26/05/2009 in Appeal No. 255/2009 of the State Commission Orissa)
1. JYOSTHNARANI SAMALVill. Samaraipur (Behind Trupti Plaza) Bonth Chhak,Bhadrak ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. LIC OF INDIAYogakshem, Jeevan Bima Marg,P.B.No.19953,Mumbai-40021 ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.P. SINGH ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 26 Mar 2010

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

 

 

No one responded to call. Even petitioner has not taken pains to remove defects as pointed at by Registry.

This revision petition has been filed against concurrent finding of Fora below for enhancement of compensation awarded in proceeding. State Commission in its finding, while upholding order of District Forum, found that adequate compensation was awarded to petitioner. Having gone through finding  of  State  Commission,  we  find  no  merit  in  revision  petition and

 

-2-

 

revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, non compliance and also on merits, with no order as to costs.



......................JB.N.P. SINGHPRESIDING MEMBER
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER