Chandigarh

DF-I

EA/130/2009

Harjit Singh Padda - Complainant(s)

Versus

LIC of India - Opp.Party(s)

Mohit Sareen

10 May 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 130 of 2009
1. Harjit Singh Paddaaged 49 yrs. S/o Late Sh. Hazara singh R/o House No. 845 HIG Flats Phase-2 SAS Nagar Mohali ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. LIC of IndiaDivisional office, SEctor-17, Chandigarh2. Senior Divisional Manager LIC of IndiaDivisional office SEctor-17 Chandigarh3. Branch ManagerLIC of India Branch office Mohali ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Mohit Sareen , Advocate for
For the Respondent :Archna Sharma, Advocate

Dated : 10 May 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

                                                            Execution Application No. 130 of 2009       

in

Complaint Case No. 999 of 2008

 

 

Harjit Singh Padda, aged 49 years, s/o Late Sh.Hazara Singh, R/o H.No.845, HIG Flats, Phase-2, SAS Nagar, Mohali.                                               –              Complainant

 

                                    Versus

 

1.         LIC of India, Divisional Office, Sector 17, Chandigarh

2.         Senior Divisional Manager, LIC of India, Divisional Office, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

3.         Branch Manager, LIC of India, Branch Office, Mohali.                                                                                                                                  –            Opposite Parties

 

Present:          Sh.Mohit Sareen, Advocate for Complainant.

                        Ms.Archana Sharma, Advocate for OPs.                

                                                           

                                                            ORDER

 

                        In view of the statement made by counsel for the complainant, this execution application is dismissed as withdrawn. The complainant would be at liberty to file afresh execution application as & when the stay order is vacated by the Hon’ble National Commission or after the decision of RP No.62 of 2010, if need be.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

10.05.2010      (MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA)      (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)       (ASHOK RAJ BHANDARI)

                          MEMBER                                                     MEMBER                                              PRESIDING MEMBER                                



DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,