Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/10/2016

D. shannakesu - Complainant(s)

Versus

LIC of India, The chairman - Opp.Party(s)

Sivasankar

03 Nov 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

                                                                                              F.A. No.10/2016

(Against the order in C.C. No.79/2012, dated:25.08.2015 on the file of

D.C.D.R.F., Salem)

                                                                  DATED THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

D. Shannakesu,

S/o. Duraisamy,

Helper,S.R. No.10104,

Office of Junior Engineer (O&M),

TANGEDCO (South),

Kolathur Post,

Mettur Taluk,

Salem District                                                                                                                                   .. Appellants / Complainant

-Versus-

1. The Chairman,

Life Insurance Corporation of India,

Nariman Point,

Yogeskshema, Jeevan Bima Marg,

Post Box No. 19953,

Mumbai – 400 021.

 

2. The Zonal Manager,

South Zone,

Life Insurance Corporation of India,

LIC Building,

153, Anna Salai,

Post Box No. 2450,

Chennai – 600 002.

 

3. The Senior divisional Manager,

Life Insurance Corporation of India,

Gandhi Road,

Salem.

 

4. The Branch Manager,

Life Insurance Corporation of India,

Mettur Dam – 636 401.                                                                                               .. Respondent / Opposite parties.

Counsel for the Appellants / Complainant                     : M/s. Siva sankar

Counsel for the Respondent  / Opposite parties            : M/s. K. Kumaran

          This appeal coming up before us on 03.11.2021 for hearing. Due to non – representation of the Appellant, this Commission made the following order:                                                                                                

Docket order

 

            Respondent present. No representation for appellant. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant and for filing written argument of both and for arguments. When the matter was called at 10.30 am the appellant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.15 pm, then also the appellant has not appeared and also parties had not filed written argument. Hence keeping the appeal pending is of no use as parties are not interested in prosecuting the case.

            Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                      Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.