Haryana

Ambala

CC/248/2021

Priyanka - Complainant(s)

Versus

LG - Opp.Party(s)

Nitin Sharma

14 Mar 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                          Complaint case no.         :        248 of 2021.

                                                          Date of Institution           :         13.08.2021.

                                                          Date of decision    :         14.03.2023.

 

     Priyanka resident of House No.442, Near Central Bank of India, Saha, Sub Tehsil Saha,      District Ambala. 

          ……. Complainant.

 

                                                Versus

 

     1.       LG, D-59 site 4, Industrial Area, Kasna Road, Surajpur, Greater Noida (UP)-                      201306 through its authorized signatory.

     2.       M/s Madaan Electronics, SCO No.4 & 5, Jagadhri Road, Near Punjab Kesri,                      Ambala Cantt. through its authorized signatory.

     3.       Advance Electronics, # 1083/84, Bengali Mohalla, Old Alu Godon, Ambala                      Cantt., through its authorized signatory.

 

                                                                                       ….…. Opposite Parties.

         

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member.

                   Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.         

                            

Present:       Shri Nitin Agnihotri, Advocate, counsel for the complainant.                                Shri Rajeev Sachdeva, Advocate, counsel for the OPs No.1 to 3. 

           

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order by:-  Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

                   Today, the case was fixed for remaining arguments. However, learned counsel for the OPs No.1 to 3 has suffered a statement, which is recorded separately, to the effect that the OPs No.1 to 3 are ready to settle the matter on the condition that the depreciation of 10% will be deducted on the invoice value of the product, the complainant will have to purchase a new product of LG and the remaining amount will be adjusted in the purchase of new product. Old product shall be returned by the complainant.  Learned counsel for the complainant has also suffered a statement that he has heard the abovesaid statement given by the learned counsel for the OPs No.1 to 3 and agrees with the same, therefore, he withdraws the present complaint on behalf of the complainant.

                   In view of the statement suffered by the learned counsel for the OPs No.1 to 3 and the learned counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that parties shall remain bound by their statements. Certified copy of this order passed in Lok Adalat be supplied to the parties concerned, free of costs, as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room, after due compliance.

Announced on: 14.03.2023. 

 

          Member                          Member                                   President

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.