Haryana

Karnal

CC/134/2023

Vinod Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

LG Electronics India Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Rajesh Bhardwaj

15 May 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                                     Complaint No.134 of 2023

                                                                     Date of instt.27.02.2023

                                                                     Date of Decision:15.05.2023

 

Vinod Kumar S/o Sh. Vishan Dass R/o Lakhpat colony, Taraori, Tehsil Nilokheri District Karnal.                              

…….Complainant.

                                                Versus

1. LG Electronics India Pvt., Ltd., A-24/6 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Estate, Mathura road, New Delhi-11004, through its M.D.,/Director/Auth., Person.
2. M/s New Katyal Electronics, Kisan Basti road, Nilokheri, District Karnal, thorugh its Prop./partner Mr. Mukesh & Mr. Ashok.

                                                                                      …..Opposite Parties.

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before       Sh. Jaswant Singh………President.   

                   Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                   Smt. Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

 

Present:  Sh. Vinod Kumar, complainant in person alongwith Sh. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Advocate.

        Sh. Mohit Sachdeva, counsel for the OP-1.

      

         Today the case is fixed for filing the written version on behalf of the OP-1 and notice to the OP-2.

                Learned counsel for the OP-1 has suffered a separate statement that for the sake of good will of the company, the company is ready to replace the Air Conditioner of the complainant with new one of same specifications as per the satisfaction of the complainant, subject to deposit the old unit with the service centre. Two weeks time may kindly be given for providing the replacement. Further if the complainant wants to get another AC amounting more than invoice value in question than he will have to pay the difference amount. No installation charges will be charged.

                 On the other hand, complainant has suffered separate his statement to the effect that the matter has been compromised with the OP-1. So he does not want to pursue the present complaint further and withdraws the same being compromised.

              In view of the above statements, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn being compromised. Both parties will bound the statement of their respective counsels. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:15.05.2023.                

                            President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member