West Bengal

North 24 Parganas

CC/256/2018

Souvik Ray - Complainant(s)

Versus

Lenovo (India ) Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Bibhas Mondal

29 Aug 2018

ORDER

DCDRF North 24 Paraganas Barasat
Kolkata-700126.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/256/2018
( Date of Filing : 14 Jun 2018 )
 
1. Souvik Ray
S/O Syamal Ray, 100, Ramlal Agarwalla Lane, P.O.-Sinthi, P.S.-Baranagar, Kol-50
North 24 Parganas
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Lenovo (India ) Pvt. Ltd.
Ferns Icon, Lavel-2, Doddenakundi Village, Marathahalli Quater Ring Road, K.R.Puram, Hobli, Pin-560037
Bangalore
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Shilpi Majumdar MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 29 Aug 2018
Final Order / Judgement

DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

NORTH 24 Pgs., BARASAT.

C. C. CASE NO- 256/2018

 

Date of Filing                          Date of Admission                     Date of Disposal

 14.06.2018                                09.07.2018                                 29.08.2018

                                           

Complainant/s:-            1.       Souvik Ray

S/o Syamal Ray

Residing at

100, Ramlal Agarwalla Lane,

P.O- Sinthi, Dist.- North 24 Parganas

PIN- 700050, P.S- Baranagar

 

  =Vs.=

OP/s:-                            1.       Lenovo (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Ferns Icon, Level 2,

Doddenakundi Village,

Marathahalli, Outer Ring Road,

K.R. Puram, Hobli,

Bangalore- 560037, Karnataka

P.S- K.R. Puram Market

 

2.       The Manager,

Syscomp Infosol-STE

BD- 79, Ground floor,

Sector- 1, Near 3 No. Water tank

Saltlake City, P.O- Bidhannagar

C.C Block, Kolkata- 700064

P.S- D.F. Block   

 

 P R E S E N T    :-  Sri. Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay………President.

                     :-  Smt.  Silpi Majumder  …………….……….. Member.

                       

Final Order & Judgment

 

          The complainant is present in person.

 

          Today the record is placed in view of the put up petition filed by the complainant.

 

By filing a petition the complainant has stated that as the grievance of him have already been redressed by the OPs amicably out of Court, he is not willing to proceed with this complaint further and prays for withdrawal of the complaint.

 

According to the complainant if this prayer is not allowed he will be seriously prejudiced prayer is made by the complainant for allowing this application.

 

 

Cont……………..2

 

:2:

 

 

          Upon perusal of the application filed today by the complainant we have noticed that where the complainant is not inclined to proceed further with this complaint as the dispute has already been settled by the OPs out of Court, hence the complaint is dismissed.

         

          Hence it is ordered that the Consumer Complaint no- 256/2018 is hereby dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.

         

Let plain copy of this order be given to the parties free of cost as per the CPR, 2005.

 

 

 

  Member                                                                                          President

                                                                             Dictated and corrected by

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. Shilpi Majumdar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.