Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/38/06

DR.CH.PARTHASARTHI RAO - Complainant(s)

Versus

LATE P.VIJAYA KUMAR - Opp.Party(s)

M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

10 Nov 2008

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/38/06
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Chittoor-I)
 
1. DR.CH.PARTHASARTHI RAO
P.NO. B-19 VIKRAMPURI SEC-BAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. LATE P.VIJAYA KUMAR
H.NO.4-6-24 FATHEPURA D OPP.RURAL POLICE S. KARIMNAGAR
Andhra Pradesh
2. MR.P.SEKHAR
R/O MANIKANTA FURNITURE WORKS NEAR RURAL POLICE STATION OLD BAZAR
KARIMNAGAR
Andhra Pradesh
3. P.BALAKRISHNA
MANIKANTA FURNITURE WORK, NEAR RURAL POLICE STATION OLD BAZAR, KARIMNAGAR
KARIMNAGAR
Andhra Pradesh
4. SMT.P.AMMAKKA
R/O MANIKANTA FURNITURE WORKS NEAR RURAL POLICE STATION OLD BAZAR
KARIMNAGAR
Andhra Pradesh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

 ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 38/2006 against C.D. 535/1998 , Dist. Forum, Karimnagar 

Between:

 

Dr. CH. Parthasarathi Rao

S/o. CH. Muralidhar Rao

Age: 50 years, Medical Practitioner

Swetha Nursing Home,

OldEmployment Office Road

Karimangar.

Presently residing at

Plot No. B-19, Vikrampuri

Secunderabad.1. Poluju Vijaya Kumar (Died)

 

2. P. Balakrishna,

S/o. Chandraiah

 

3. Smt. P. Ammakka

W/o. P. Balakrishna

Age: 50 years,

 

4. P. Sekhar

S/o. Balakrishna

Age: 30 years

All are R/o. Manikanta Furniture Works

Near Rural Police Station

Old Bazar, Karimnagar.

 

(R2 to R4 are brought on

Record as per order in

I.A. 2152/2006 Dt. 22.11.2006)                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Respondent:                     

 

QUORUM:

                       

                                                                         

 

MONDAY, THIS THE TENTH

 

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

           

 

 

         

This is an appeal preferred by the opposite party Dr. CH. Parthasarathi Rao when he was directed to 

 

                KamineniHospital  Hyderabad   

 

                in normal limits, and as such he directed barium meal test.  The complainant brought the report on  Accordingly, he was treated for T.B.        

 

 

 

 

Informed that he would come after                     Kamineni SuperSpecialityHospital,Hyderabad           KamineniHospital           Since he took treatment at Kamineni  

There was no   

 

           The complainant  

             

 

             Since the patient was treated as    

 

           besides history of deafness and inability to speak.     th

Drug 

         

 

 

                  Admittedly, even after one month when the vomitings could not be contained the appellant performed the Laparatamy and Gastro Jujunostomy. KamineniSuperSpecialityHospital,Hyderabad.         Again Barium meal test was conducted wherein it was found  Endoscopy was also conducted  .”   Subsequently, NilofurHospital   MahaveerHospital       NilouferHospital     KamineniHospital    

 

come to the conclusion      

 

         Kamineni HospitalNilouferHospital             We repeat that the appellant had intestines.          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

 

         

                                               

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.