BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

F.A. 454/2008 against C.C. 844/2006, Dist. Forum-I,Hyderabad 

Between:

M/s. Narne Estates Pvt. Ltd.,

No. 1 Gunrock Enclave

Secunderabad-500 009

Rep. by its Chairman &

Managing Director

Col. N. Ranga Rao

S/o. N. V. Naidu                                                                                                 

And

LACO Yella Reddy

S/o. Late O. Rama Subba Reddy

R/o. Plot No. 673, 

Defence Colony.

Sainikpuri,

Secunderabad-500 094.          

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Resps:                              

QUORUM:

&

FRIDAY, THIS THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

          Hyderabad 

which he did not pay.    Repeated letters were sent to the complainant.  

Aggrieved by the said decision, the opposite party preferred this appeal contending that the Dist. Forum did not appreciate the facts         

It is an undisputed fact that the appellant    admeasuring 250 sq.yds in Sector    

The fact that the complainant has paid the entire amount except an amount of Rs. 2,250/- as on 22.3.1996 is evidenced by their own letter Ex. B2.             

The complainant   Evidently in      

At the outset, we may state that admittedly the letters were addressed to the old address at Musheerabad.           

When the complainant has received letter of cancellation of allotment    India,Hyderabad      

The appellant never mentioned           

The Dist. Forum after considering the above evidence has correctly come to the conclusion that the appellant cannot ask for development charges without making any development.    

For the reasons not known the Dist. Forum directed the appellant to register an alternative plot         

At the time of                 

deed as per the terms of the agreement.       

The Dist. Forum did not award any interest      compensation per year, could not be said to be high.    

In the result the appeal is dismissed.     Time for compliance four weeks.

PRESIDENT