Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

RBT/CC/68/2022

G.Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

L.G.Electronics India Private Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.S.Varanesh

31 Oct 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/68/2022
 
1. G.Kumar
royapuram ch-13
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. L.G.Electronics India Private Ltd
New Delhi 17
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law) PRESIDENT
  THIRU.P.MURUGAN, M.Com, ICWA (Inter), B.L., MEMBER
 
PRESENT:M/s.S.Varanesh, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Tr.Kumarvel, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 31 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR

 BEFORE  TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law)                              .…. PRESIDENT
               THIRU P.MURUGAN, M.Com., ICWA(Inter)., B.L.,                                             ….. MEMBER-II

CC. No.68/2022
THIS MONDAY, THE 31st  DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

Mr.G.Kumar,
No.17/22 Grade Garden 2nd Street,
Kalmandapam, Royapuram, Chennai -13.                                                            ....Complainant.
                                                                                       //Vs//
1.LG Electronics India Private Limited,
    Rep. by its Manager,
   A-Wing 3rd Floor, D-3, District Center, Saket,   New Delhi – 110017.

2.The Authorized Dealer,
   Rep. by its Manager,
   Vasanth &Co, No.17. M.S.Kovil Street,
   Royapuram, Chennai -13.                                                                                 ....Opposite parties
 
ORDER
PRONOUNCED BY TMT. Dr. S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI,   PRESIDENT.

               The complaint was filed by the complainant U/S 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service against the opposite parties in selling water purifier along with a prayer to direct the opposite parties to replace the LG water purifier WW120EP with a new one or to return the cost of the same and to pay a sum of Rs.35,000/- towards compensation for the loss and injury suffered by the complainant due to the negligence and deficiency in service committed by opposite parties and to pay a sum of Rs.7,000/- towards cost of the proceedings to the complainant.
No representation for the complainant.  1st Opposite party present. Inspite of sufficient opportunities and information provided by this commission, no written argument was filed by complainant.   Hence, this commission is of the view that no purpose in keeping the complaint on file.  Hence the consumer complaint is dismissed for non prosecution.  No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 31st October 2022. 

 Sd/-                                                                                                                      Sd/-
MEMBER-II                                                                                                     PRESIDENT

 
 
[ TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L.,Ph.D(Law)]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ THIRU.P.MURUGAN, M.Com, ICWA (Inter), B.L.,]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.