Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/17/314

Jalajakumari - Complainant(s)

Versus

KWA - Opp.Party(s)

14 Oct 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/17/314
( Date of Filing : 10 Aug 2017 )
 
1. Jalajakumari
CRA-187,chenmthai,tvpm
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. KWA
vellayambalam,tvpm
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 14 Oct 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 314/2017 Filed on 10/08/2017

ORDER DATED 14/10/2022

 

Complainant

:

Jalajakumari.K.R., ‘Basera”, CRA-187, Chenthi, Pongumoodu, Medical College.P.O., Thiruvananthapruam - 695 011.

                   (Party in person)

Opposite parties

:

  1. Assistant Engineer, Kerala Water Authority, Pongummoodu, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 011.
  2. The Managing Director, Jala Bhavan, Vellayambalam, Thiruvananthapuram.

(By Adv.Issac Samuel)

 

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter thecommission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.  After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties.  The opposite parties entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegation raised by the complainant.  The matter was referred to settlement talk and on discussion the matter was settled and the case was posted to this date for reporting settlement.  When the case came up for consideration today, the complainant filed a memo stating that the opposite party has complied the condition mentioned in the settlement talk held on 02/04/2022.  The complainant further stated that she is not willing to further proceed with this complaint.  The memo filed by the complainant is accepted and recorded.  In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the proceeding, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled. 

                        In the result the complaint is dismissed as settled.  There will no order as to cost.

 

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 14th  day of October,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.