KV Jose V/S PA Augustine - Consumer Court Case

Kerala

Wayanad

86/2007

PA Augustine - Complainant(s)

Versus

KV Jose - Opp.Party(s)

26 Jul 2008

ORDER

CDRF Wayanad
Civil Station,Kalpetta North
consumer case(CC) No. 86/2007

PA Augustine						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
KV Jose A R mathew						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

1. K GHEEVARGHESE 2. P Raveendran 3. SAJI MATHEW

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

By Smt. Saji Mathew, Member The gist of the Complaint is as follows: The 2nd opposite party has given a gas connection of Bharath gas from the Kalpetta Distributer. The complainant has settled all the consideration matters with the 2nd opposite party. The complainant is not getting refilled cylinders for the last 6 months. On enquiry at the gas agency, they told the complainant that the connection was transferred to Manathavady and the refilled cylinders are being taken from Manathavady. So the complainant has sustained loss and damage to an amount of Rs.10,000/-. The complainant prays for an order directing the opposite party to pay an amount of Rs. 10,000/- to him. He also prays for the reconnection of gas supply to him. 2. The opposite party were set exparte. The complainant has filed proof affidavit and document Ext. A1 and A2 were marked on the side of the complainant. 3. The matters in consideration are as follows: (1) Whether there is any unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party.? (2) Whether the complainant is entitled to get any relief. 4. Point No.1 and 2: It is seen from Ext. A1 that the complainant has paid Rs.3,350/- to the 2nd opposite party. From Ext. A1 it is seen that cylinder is not delivered after 9.3.2008. So Point No.1 and 2 are decided in favour of the complainant. Hence the 2nd opposite party is directed to pay Rs.3,350/- (Rupees Three thousand three hundred and fifty only) to the complainant within 30 days of this order. Pronounced in the open Forum on this the day of 26th July, 2008. PRESIDENT: Sd/- MEMBER: I Sd/- MEMBER: II Sd/- /True copy/ Sd/- PRESIDENT, CDRF, WAYANAD. Witness examined for complainant: Nil Witness examined for Opposite parties: Nil Exhibits marked for complainant: A1 Copy of Letter Dated: 30.3.1993 A2 Copy of Consumer card Dated: 20.8.91 Exhibits marked for opposite parties: Nil

By Smt. Saji Mathew, Member The gist of the Complaint is as follows: The 2nd opposite party has given a gas connection of Bharath gas from the Kalpetta Distributer. The complainant has settled all the consideration matters with the 2nd opposite party. The complainant is not getting refilled cylinders for the last 6 months. On enquiry at the gas agency, they told the complainant that the connection was transferred to Manathavady and the refilled cylinders are being taken from Manathavady. So the complainant has sustained loss and damage to an amount of Rs.10,000/-. The complainant prays for an order directing the opposite party to pay an amount of Rs. 10,000/- to him. He also prays for the reconnection of gas supply to him. 2. The opposite party were set exparte. The complainant has filed proof affidavit and document Ext. A1 and A2 were marked on the side of the complainant. 3. The matters in consideration are as follows: (1) Whether there is any unfair trade practice on the part of the opposite party.? (2) Whether the complainant is entitled to get any relief. 4. Point No.1 and 2: It is seen from Ext. A1 that the complainant has paid Rs.3,350/- to the 2nd opposite party. From Ext. A1 it is seen that cylinder is not delivered after 9.3.2008. So Point No.1 and 2 are decided in favour of the complainant. Hence the 2nd opposite party is directed to pay Rs.3,350/- (Rupees Three thousand three hundred and fifty only) to the complainant within 30 days of this order. Pronounced in the open Forum on this the day of 26th July, 2008. PRESIDENT: Sd/- MEMBER: I Sd/- MEMBER: II Sd/- /True copy/ Sd/- PRESIDENT, CDRF, WAYANAD. Witness examined for complainant: Nil Witness examined for Opposite parties: Nil Exhibits marked for complainant: A1 Copy of Letter Dated: 30.3.1993 A2 Copy of Consumer card Dated: 20.8.91 Exhibits marked for opposite parties: Nil

......................K GHEEVARGHESE
......................P Raveendran
......................SAJI MATHEW