Kerala

StateCommission

196/2004

Peringottukara Finance Investment Company Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kuttappan Chettiyar - Opp.Party(s)

R.Jayakrishnan

29 Jun 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. 196/2004
(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/01/2004 in Case No. First Appeal No. 141/2003 of District Idukki)
1. Peringottukara Finance Investment Company Ltd., Thodupuzha Rep.by K.J.Sreekumar,President,Peringottukara Chits Ltd
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

APPEAL.196/2004

JUDGMENT DATED: 29.6.2010

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU            : PRESIDENT

SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                        : MEMBER

 

Peringottukara Finance                                 : APPELLANT

Investment Company Ltd.,

Thodupuzha, Rep. by K.J.Sreekumar,

President,

Peringottukara Chits Ltd.,

(Formerly Peringottukara Finance &  

Investment Company Ltd.,)

 

(by Adv.R.Jayakrishnan)

 

     Vs.

1.Kuttappan Chettiar,                                   :RESPONDENTS

   Thakadiyil House,

   Chamapathal Bhagom,

   Vazhoor Kara,

    Kottayam District.  (died)

 

2. Usha Thankappan,

    W/o Thankappan Chettiyar,

    Elampoyil,

      -do-do-

3. Master Vishnu, S/o Thankappan Chettiyar,

    Rep.by Usha Thankappan,

     -do-do-

4. Master Kannan, S/o Thankappan Chettiyar,

    Rep.by Usha Thankappan,

     -do-do-

5. Chellamma Chettiyar, S/o Kuttappan Chettiar,

   Thakadiyil House,Anakkara.P.O.,

    8th Mile, elappara, Idukki District.

 

6. Rajamma.C, d/o Kuttappan Chettiar,

   Thakadiyil House, Elampoyil,

   Chamapathal .P.O.,

   Vazhoor ,Kottayam District.

7. Thankkamma Vijayakumar,

    d/o Kuttappan Chettiar,

   Jyothi Bhavan, Purapuzha.P.O.

    Thodupuzha.

8. Radha, d/o Kuttappan Chettiar,

   Thakadiyil House, Elampoyil,

   Chamapathal .P.O.,

   Vazhoor ,Kottayam District.

 

(By Adv.K.R.Haridas)

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU  : PRESIDENT

 

          Appellant is the opposite party/financial institution in OP.141/2003 in the file of CDRF, Idukki.  The appellant is under orders to refund the amount of interest recovered in excess of 24.44% and also to pay Rs.2000/- as compensation and cost of Rs.1500/- etc.

          2. It is the case of the complainant that he had availed a loan of Rs.1,50,000/- from the opposite party private bank and that they collected an excess of Rs.47,892.50 when  the loan was closed.  It is the contention that the opposite party violated the provisions of the Kerala Money Lenders Act, 1958.  The excess amount is sought to be refunded with compensation of Rs.2000/- and cost of Rs.1500/-.

          3. The opposite parties have contended that the amount was  availed agreeing to pay interest  at 22% per annum calculated on quarterly basis on the strength of a promissory note; and further that the appellant has agreed to pay 7% of the balance amount due as service charges and also penal interest at 6%.  The loan was closed only on 30.9.2000.  According to them they entitled to claim the above amount.

          4. The evidence adduced consisted of the testimony of PWs 1 and 2, DW1; Exts.P1 to P7 and R1 to R8.

          5. The Forum has relied on the provisions of Section 7 of the Kerala Money Lenders Act, 1958 as amended by Act 30 of 1986.  As per Section 7 of the above statute the money lender is not to charge interest at a rate exceeding 2 % above the maximum rate of interest charged by commercial banks on loans granted by them.  Opposite party had produced Ext.R8 circular of the Catholic Syrian Bank wherein the interest rate as per RBI stipulations are specified.  It is pointed out by the counsel for the appellant that as per Ext.R8 the rate of interest is specified at 22.44.%.  Hence as per Section 7 of the Money Lender Act the appellant is entitled to claim 2% more which would work out to 22.44.%.  The  appellant has not relied  on any provision or document for claiming penal interest at 6%  and hence the above was disallowed.  The appellant has relied on Ext.R3 the letter issued by the complainant agreeing to pay 7% of the balance amount due in  every quarter as service charges.  No statutory stipulation in support of the above alleged agreement has been produced or relied on.   In the   circumstances we find that there is no illegality in the order of the Forum disallowing the above 7% claimed as service charges.  Hence we find that there is no illegality in the order of the Forum.  Hence the order of the Forum is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

          Appellant is directed to refund the amount as ordered by the Forum within three months from the date of receipt of this order failing which the respondent/complainant will be entitled for interest at 12% on the outstanding amount from today.  Appeal is dismissed as above.

          Office will forward the LCR along with the copy

of this order to the Forum urgently.

 

          JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU            : PRESIDENT

 

 

          SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                        : MEMBER

 

 

ps

 

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 29 June 2010

[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT