Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/456/09

MR.Y.ASHOK S/O RAMACHANDRAM - Complainant(s)

Versus

KUN AUTOMOBILES PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MANAGER - Opp.Party(s)

M/S V.GOURI SANKARA RAO

11 Apr 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/456/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Kurnool)
 
1. MR.Y.ASHOK S/O RAMACHANDRAM
R/O 1-4-880/2/35, FLAT NO.101, SURYA HEIGHTS, SBH COLONY, VAIDEHINAGAR, HYD-80.
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. KUN AUTOMOBILES PVT.LTD.REP.BY ITS MANAGER
1-3-1042, 43, 44, 45, VICEROY HOTEL LANE, KAVADIGUDA, HYD-500 020.
HYDERABAD
Andhra Pradesh
2. KUN AUTOMOBILES PVT.LTD. REP.BY ITS MANAGER
SERVICING CENTRE, 1-8-670, AZAMABAD, RTC X ROADS,
HYDERABAD-20
ANDHRA PRADESH
3. GENERAL MOTORS INDIA PVT.LTD.,REP.BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT (MKT)
GLOBAL BUSINESS PARK, TOWER A, 6TH FLOOR, MEHRAVLI GURGAON RD,
GURAGON-122 002.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 456/2009 against C.C. Hyderabad

 

 

Between:

 

Y. Ashok, S/o. Ramachandram

Age: 39 years, Business

R/o. 1-4-880/2/35

Flat No. 101,SuryaHeights

SBH Colony, Vaidehinagar

Hyderabad.                                                                                               And

1) 

Rep. by its Manager

1-3-1042,43-45

Viceroy Hotel Lane

Kavadiguda,Hyderabad.

 

2) 

Rep. by its Manager

Servicing Centre

1-8-670, Azamabad RTC X Roads

Hyderabad.

 

3) 

Rep. by its 

GlobalBusinessPark,

Tower ‘A’, 6thMehravli Gurgeon Road

Gurageon-122 002.Opposite Parties

 

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Respondent:  

 

CORAM:

                       

                                                                                                       

 

MONDAY, THIS THE ELEVENTH DAY OF

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

1)                 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2)                                     

 

3)                       On 21.2.2008 the very same advisor asked him to come to service centre to check the working progress of the vehicle and to inspect the failed parts.                Therefore they prayed that the complaint be dismissed with costs. 

 

4)       

 

5)                  

 

6)        Therefore he prayed that the complaint be allowed. 

 

7)               

 

 

 

8)                    The complaint was   

 

9)                    It                     

 

 

 

10)                   Obviously the           

 

 

11)      

 

 

 

 

1)PRESIDENT 

 

 

2)      MEMBER 

                                                                              *pnr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“’UP LOAD – O.K.”

 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.