Kerala

StateCommission

A/09/329

Thomas Mathew Thottathil - Complainant(s)

Versus

KSEB - Opp.Party(s)

U.K.Devidas

28 Jul 2009

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/09/329
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/05/2009 in Case No. OP 184/03 of District Malappuram)
1. Thomas Mathew ThottathilKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. KSEBKerala ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

 

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

FA.329/09

JUDGMENT DATED: 28.7.09

PRESENT

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU              : PRESIDENT

SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                             : MEMBER

 

Thomas Mathew Thottathil,                        :APPELLANT

Franchisee Speed and Safe

Courier Agency

Edakkara.

(By Adv.S.Reghukumar & U.K.Devidas)

 

                       Vs.

Assistant Engineer,                                  : RESPONDENT

Electrical Section, Edakkara.P.O.,

Malappuram District.

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU    : PRESIDENT

 

          The appellant is the complainant in OP.No.184/03 in the file of CDRF, Malappuram.  The complaint filed for getting additional bill for Rs.1,08,000/- cancelled stands dismissed.

            2. It is the case of the opposite party KSEB that the APTS detected unauthorized extension from the house of the complainant to the adjust Grace hospital.  Hence the bill.

          3. The evidence adduced consisted  of the affidavit filed by the respective parties; Ext.A1, B1 and B2.

          4. The matter has been disposed   of  by a  concise and crypt  order. The complainant sought for any opportunity to cross examine the opposite party and adduce the required evidence.  According to the complainant the Forum did not provide sufficient opportunity to adduce evidence.  It appears to us that the matter requires a little more detailed consideration. In the circumstances order of the Forum is set aside.  The Forum is directed to permit the both sides to adduce further evidence and dispose of the matter by a considered order.

          5. The case will stand posted before the Forum on 14/9/09. The Forum would issue notice to the opposite parties.

Office is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Forum urgently.

 

 

JUSTICE SRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU              : PRESIDENT

 

 

 

SRI.M.K.ABDULLA SONA                     : MEMBER

 

 

 

ps

 

 

 

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 28 July 2009

[HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT