Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/68/2018

The Revenue officer, Corporation of chennai - Complainant(s)

Versus

Krishnan.M - Opp.Party(s)

V.Muralikrishnan

26 Apr 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.68/2018

 

(Against the Order dt.30.12.2016 made in C.C. No.82/2014 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (North))

DATED THE 26^TH DAY OF APRIL 2022

 

The Revenue Officer,

Represented  by his Authorised Person,

Greater Chennai Corporation,

Rippon Building,

Chennai – 600 003.                                                                                                                          .. Appellant / Opposite party.

-Versus-

 

M. Krishnan,

S/o. Late Mr. Muthusami,

No.18, Amman Koil Street,

Kozhikadai Market,

Broadway,

Chennai -  1.                                                                                                                                    .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Opposite party       : M/s. Muralikrishnan

Counsel for Respondent / Complainant      : M/s. M. Chidambaram

          This appeal coming up before us on 26.04.2022 for appearance of both, for filing written arguments of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

Docket Order

No representation for both.  This appeal is posted today for appearance of both, for filing written arguments of both and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the Appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

 

               

               Sd/-                                                                                                                       Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                                   R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                                    PRESIDENT