Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/190/2022

Jainitha S - Complainant(s)

Versus

Krishnan Nair & Sons Jewelers - Opp.Party(s)

04 Sep 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

               SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN           : PRESIDENT

          SMT.PREETHA G NAIR     : MEMBER

           SRI.VIJU.V.R                       : MEMBER

CC.NO.190/2022 (Filed on : 20/05/2022)

ORDER DATED : 04/09/2023

 

COMPLAINANT

Jainitha.S

D/o.M.Kumaraswami,

Sreemurukan,

Vagamon,

Idukki, Pin – 685503

(Party in person)

VS

OPPOSITE PARTY

Krishnan Nair & Sons Jewellers,

East Fort, Thiruvananthapuram

Pin – 695001

(By Adv.N.Padmini)

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN                  : PRESIDENT

1. This complaint is filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2.  This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party. Opposite party entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegations raised by the complainant. Subsequently the complainant filed affidavit by post on 26/08/2022 and the same was taken on file. Subsequent to that the complainant was continuously absent and hence on 30/06/2023 this commission issued notice to the complainant to appear before this commission today to further proceed with this complaint. When the case came up for consideration today, it is noticed that the notice issued to the complainant was served and even after accepting the notice complainant failed to appear before this commission and hence we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint. As the complainant failed to mark the documents inspite of giving sufficient opportunities, we find that there is no piece of evidence against the opposite party to substantiate the allegations raised by the complainant. In the above circumstances, we find that the complainant has miserably failed to prove the case against the opposite party and hence this complaint is to be dismissed for want of evidence.

                  In the result, the complaint is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

         A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

         Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 4th day of September 2023.

                                                                                               Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

                                                                                       Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                                                                                        Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R        : MEMBER

be/

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.