View 92 Cases Against Jewelers
Jainitha S filed a consumer case on 04 Sep 2023 against Krishnan Nair & Sons Jewelers in the Thiruvananthapuram Consumer Court. The case no is CC/190/2022 and the judgment uploaded on 20 Sep 2023.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
PRESENT
SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
SMT.PREETHA G NAIR : MEMBER
SRI.VIJU.V.R : MEMBER
CC.NO.190/2022 (Filed on : 20/05/2022)
ORDER DATED : 04/09/2023
COMPLAINANT
Jainitha.S
D/o.M.Kumaraswami,
Sreemurukan,
Vagamon,
Idukki, Pin – 685503
(Party in person)
VS
OPPOSITE PARTY
Krishnan Nair & Sons Jewellers,
East Fort, Thiruvananthapuram
Pin – 695001
(By Adv.N.Padmini)
ORDER
SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
1. This complaint is filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.
2. This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party. Opposite party entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegations raised by the complainant. Subsequently the complainant filed affidavit by post on 26/08/2022 and the same was taken on file. Subsequent to that the complainant was continuously absent and hence on 30/06/2023 this commission issued notice to the complainant to appear before this commission today to further proceed with this complaint. When the case came up for consideration today, it is noticed that the notice issued to the complainant was served and even after accepting the notice complainant failed to appear before this commission and hence we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint. As the complainant failed to mark the documents inspite of giving sufficient opportunities, we find that there is no piece of evidence against the opposite party to substantiate the allegations raised by the complainant. In the above circumstances, we find that the complainant has miserably failed to prove the case against the opposite party and hence this complaint is to be dismissed for want of evidence.
In the result, the complaint is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.
A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.
Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 4th day of September 2023.
Sd/-
P.V.JAYARAJAN : PRESIDENT
Sd/-
PREETHA G NAIR : MEMBER
Sd/-
VIJU.V.R : MEMBER
be/
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.