Kerala

StateCommission

CC/16/117

BOYMOON B - Complainant(s)

Versus

KRISHNA SADASIVAN - Opp.Party(s)

M T PRASANTH

16 Feb 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/117
( Date of Filing : 17 Oct 2016 )
 
1. BOYMOON B
Mg.PARTNER M/S MOVIE STUDIOS REEMS KARALI VALLAKADAVU PO THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
2. JOYMOON B
NAS VILLA TC 92/1408 BSRA K 36 PETTAH PO THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695024
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. KRISHNA SADASIVAN
PROPRIETOR SS DIGITAL SYSTEM SAISANKARAM TC 24/657 1 THYCAUD THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695014
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
  SRI.RANJIT.R MEMBER
  SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Feb 2023
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

C.C.No.117/2016

JUDGEMENT DATED: 16.02.2023

 

 

PRESENT:

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN 

:

PRESIDENT

SRI. RANJIT  R.

:

MEMBER

SMT. BEENA KUMARY A.

:

MEMBER

 

 

                                               

COMPLAINANTS:

 

 

1.

Boymoon B., S/o Balachandran, Managing Partner, M/s B.J. Movie Studios, ‘Reems’, Karali, Vallakkadavu P.O., Thiruvananthapuram residing at Nas Villa (T.C.92/1408), BSRA K-36, Pettah P.O. & Village, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 024

2.

Joymoon B., S/o Balachandran, Managing Partner, M/s B.J. Movie Studios, ‘Reems’, Karali, Vallakkadavu P.O., Thiruvananthapuram residing at Nas Villa (T.C.92/1408), BSRA K-36, Pettah P.O. & Village, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 024

 

 

(by Adv. M.T. Prasanth)

 

Vs.

 

 

OPPOSITE PARTY:

 

 

 

Krishna Sadasivan, Proprietor, S.S. Digital System, Saisankaram, T.C.24/657(1), Thycaud, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 014

 

 

(by Adv. B.A. Krishnakumar)

 

 

JUDGEMENT

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

 

 

 

          Opposite parties represented through counsel.  There is no representation for the complainant today also.  This is a complaint filed in the year 2016.  We notice from the proceedings that there has been consistently no representation for the complainant for a long period of time.  The opposite party has filed a petition questioning the maintainability of the complaint.  A copy of the petition was served on the counsel for the complainant also.  Though the matter was being posted for objections and hearing, no objections filed.  It is obvious that the complainant is no longer interested in pursuing this case.  This complaint is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.

 

 

 

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN 

:

PRESIDENT

RANJIT  R.

:

MEMBER

BEENA KUMARY A.

:

MEMBER

 

 

SL

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ SRI.RANJIT.R]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.