Per Dr. S.K.KAKADE, Hon’ble Presiding Member.

Advocate Mr.Mishrikotkar is present on behalf of respondent. None present for appellant even after second call. Heard advocate Mr.Mishrikotkar in the second session. As per learned advocate for respondent the appellant is continuously absent after filing this appeal and though notice before admission was issued. The appellant has failed to even serve the notice to the respondent. Advocate Mr.Mishrikotkar appeared suo-moto in this appeal on behalf of respondent. Further he filed pursis stating that the appellant has deposited only Rs.1,05,000/- on 31 July 2021, instead of 50% amount as per Section 41 which is required to be paid while filing the appeal and hence in view of the continuous absence of the appellant and failure to deposit the 50% amount as per the order passed by the Additional District Consumer Commission Nagpur. The learned advocate for respondent prayed for dismissal of appeal. Perused the record. Appellant failed to appear before this Commission for last three times and also fail to comply the order passed by this Commission. Accepting the submission made by the learned advocate for respondent the Commission thinks its proper to dismiss this appeal as the appellant is not serious and does not want to proceed further. Hence the appeal is dismissed in default for want of prosecution.