Madhya Pradesh

StateCommission

A/16/1506

SMT.SAVITA GEDA - Complainant(s)

Versus

KRISHNA BUILDERS & DEV. - Opp.Party(s)

SH.AJAY VISHWAKARMA

09 Mar 2019

ORDER

LOK ADALAT

M.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

76, Arera Hills, BHOPAL 462 011 (M.P.)

(Proceedings under Chapter VI of The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (39 of 1987) and Lok Adalat Scheme of 1997 framed thereunder)

FA No.1506/2016.

 

Smt. Savita Geda.                                                                               ….. Appellant.

 

VERSUS

 

Krishna Builders & Developers.                                                         …. Respondent.

 

FA No.1643/2016.

 

Krishna Builders & Developers.                                                         ….. Appellant.

 

VERSUS

 

Smt. Savita Geda..                                                      …. Respondent.

 

                                   

BENCH OF LOK ADALAT

 

1. HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SHANTANU KEMKAR
2. HON’BLE DR. (SMT) MONIKA MALIK

AWARD/ ORDER

Date of                       ORDER WITH SIGNATURE                                        Order of the Registrar 

 

09.03.2019                  Shri Ajay Shukla, learned counsel for the complainant / Smt. Savita Geda.

                                    Smt. Savita Geda – complainant is also present in person.

                                    Shri Deepak Panjwani, learned counsel for opposite party / Krishna Builders.

                                    Shri Vishal Shyamnani, Manager of Krishna Builders is also present.

                                    Both the parties have filed an application for taking mutual settlement on record.  The same has been signed by the parties and their respective counsel.

                                    The said application is taken on record and is marked as Ex. “X” for identification.

                                    Learned counsel for the parties and the parties submit that both these appeals may be disposed of in terms of the settlement application Ex. “X”.

We have gone through the terms of settlement as recorded in application Ex. “X”.The same is lawful.

In the circumstances as agreed by the parties and their respective counsel both the appeals are disposed of in terms of settlement application, Ex.”X”.The same shall be treated as

Contd……2.

Date of                       ORDER WITH SIGNATURE                                        Order of the Registrar 

 

• 2 -

 

 

an order and shall be binding on the parties and enforceable between the parties as provided under The Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.

The District Forum to release the amount of Rs.4,00,000/- out of the amount deposited with it by the opposite party – Krishna Builders in favour of the complainant.Rest of the amount out of deposited amount of Rs.5,00,000/- and Rs.25,000/- (towards pre-deposit) be refunded by the Forum to the opposite party / Krishna Builders.

The appeals stand disposed of accordingly.

 

 

(Justice Shantanu.S.Kemkar)(Dr.Smt.Monika Malik)

•