Kerala

Kottayam

CC/103/2022

Sulekha Gopakumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

KPB Nidhi Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

V R Raju

20 Feb 2023

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/103/2022
( Date of Filing : 10 May 2022 )
 
1. Sulekha Gopakumar
Cheruvapurayil House, Chanaganacherry P O Kottayam.
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. KPB Nidhi Ltd.
The Branch Manager, KPB Nidhi Ltd, Nediyakalaparampil Buildings, Changanacherry
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 20 Feb 2023
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated, the 20th day of February, 2023

 

                                              Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Smt. Bindhu R.  Member

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 103/2022 (Filed on 10-05-2022)

 

Petitioner                                            :         Sulekha Gopakumar,

                                                                   Cheruvapurayil House,

                                                                   (Malakunnam)

                                                                   Changanacherry, Kottayam.

                                                                   (Adv. V.R. Raju)

                                                                             Vs.

Opposite parties                                 :         The Branch Manager,

                                                                   KPB Nidhi Ltd.

                                                                   Nediyakalaparampil,

                                                                   Buildings, Changanacherry.

                                                                   (Adv. K. Madhavan Pillai)                                              

O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          Complainant and opposite party represented.  Counsel for the complainant submitted that the complainant is not pressing.  Counsel for the complainant filed a memo stating that the complainant is not willing to proceed further with complaint and compliant is not pressing.  Hence the complaint is disposed as not pressed.

          Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 20th day of February, 2023

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

Smt. Bindhu R.  Member                 Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                  Sd/-

                                                                             Assistant Registrar

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.