Andhra Pradesh

Visakhapatnam-II

cc/364/2012

Jayanthi Gopi Krishna - Complainant(s)

Versus

Kottakki Lakshmi - Opp.Party(s)

S. Sreerama Murthy

08 Apr 2015

ORDER

                                              Date of Registration of the Complaint:06-11-2012

                                                                                                Date of Order:08-04-2015

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMERS FORUM-II AT

                             VISAKHAPATNAM

 

P  r  e  s  e  n  t:

   

1.  Sri H. Ananda Rao, M.A., L.L.B.,

     President

2.  Smt K. Saroja, M.A. B.L.,

     Lady Member

                                3. Sri C.V. Rao, M.A., B.L.,

                                     Male Member

 

              Wednesday, the 8^th day of April, 2015.

                                   CONSUMER CASE No.364/ 2012

Between:-

Jayanthi Gopi Krishna, S/o Late Annaji Rao,

aged 38 years, residing at D. No. 23-22-22/A,

Sivalayam Street, Visakhapatnam-1.

                                                                                          …. Complainant   

 And:-                                                                                  

Smt. Kottakki  Lakshmi, W/o K. Jagan Mohan Rao,

Hindu, aged 55 years, residing at D. No. 4-43-17,

Pedawaltair, Visakhapatnam-530 017 and Rep. by her

General Power of Attorney Holder Telidevara Veera

Venkata Satya Sri Rama Krishna, S/o Late Bhaskar Rao,

Hindu, aged 53 years, resident of F-2, S.B.I. Apartments,

Vijayanagar Palace, Visakhapatnam-530 017.

                                                                                    … Opposite Party

 

                                                                               

This case coming on 08.04.2015 for dismissal of Complaint before us in the presence of Sri S. Sreerama Murthy, Advocate for the Complainant and the Opposite Party being exparte and having stood over till this date for consideration, this Forum made the following:

 

                                                ORDER

         (As per Sri H. Ananda Rao, Honourable President on behalf of the Bench)

 

          The Complaint is called absent.   No representation inspite of several opportunities are given.     Hence, we constrained to dismiss the Complaint as he is having no interest in pursue of the case.

Sd/-                                          Sd/-                                   Sd/-

Male Member                         Lady Member                               President